Open shaneseaton opened 5 years ago
Yeah - there is a register (dataset)
<http://linked.data.gov.au/dataset/asgs2016/australia/>
a reg:Register ;
reg:register <http://linked.data.gov.au/dataset/asgs2016/reg/> .
but no corresponding (singleton) member of this dataset. If it were similar to
<http://linked.data.gov.au/dataset/asgs2016/stateorterritory/VIC>
a <http://linked.data.gov.au/def/asgs#StateOrTerritory> , geo:Feature ;
reg:register <http://linked.data.gov.au/dataset/asgs2016/stateorterritory/> .
then you might expect
<http://linked.data.gov.au/dataset/asgs2016/australia/AU>
a <http://linked.data.gov.au/def/asgs#Country> , geo:Feature ;
reg:register <http://linked.data.gov.au/dataset/asgs2016/australia/> ;
geo:sfContains <http://linked.data.gov.au/dataset/asgs2016/stateorterritory/VIC> ,
<http://linked.data.gov.au/dataset/asgs2016/stateorterritory/NSW> ,
<http://linked.data.gov.au/dataset/asgs2016/stateorterritory/WA> , ... .
@dr-shorthair
then you might expect
http://linked.data.gov.au/dataset/asgs2016/australia/AU a http://linked.data.gov.au/def/asgs#Country , geo:Feature ;
Actually the registry is: http://linked.data.gov.au/dataset/asgs2016/australia/ , not /country/ (just noticed you already fixed that up in your comment) and the feature instance is http://linked.data.gov.au/dataset/asgs2016/australia/036 because who knows why.
@shaneseaton It was never harvested because its just a single instance, and the register is a register with one thing in it. It would pretty easy to add it into the harvest routine.
A set with a single member is still a set!
Should the name of the register be called Country
given that that is the featureType?
If the feature-type is part of the URI, then there should be a common pattern across all feature-types.
The register name includes the feature-type in lower-case (recommended pattern for instance data). I suggest no trailing "/" in the canonical form. A request for one with a trailing "/" it should just be redirected to the no-trailing-/ address.
I used "61" as the country code ...
FWIW - this diagram https://www.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/D3310114.nsf/home/Australian+Statistical+Geography+Standard+(ASGS) has 'Australia' at the top, rather than 'Country' which is probably the source of the ambiguity.
@dr-shorthair in the ABS dataset (accessed via their WFS endpoint) the feature class type is "Australia" and the instance name is "036", see it represented here: http://linked.data.gov.au/dataset/asgs2016/australia/036
So the class name in the ontology is inconsistent with the ABS documentation. This is something to bounce back to Laurent at ABS I think.
There is a concept of Australia in the Reg of Regs, and it has a ttl representation too, but not sure its being harvested correctly for the main cache