Open AZEconoGal opened 4 years ago
I read that some of your numbers are 5-day centered moving averages with ESTIMATES for the following 2 days.
Where did you read that?
"This analysis uses a 5-day moving average to visualize the number of new COVID-19 cases and calculate the rate of change. This is calculated for each day by averaging the values of that day, the two days before, and the two next days." https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/data/new-cases
That would explain why your numbers are so divergent from WHO. I understand that with WHO there are lags. I get that. But, I would never recommend using estimates for the future 2 days. Your Expected Value for the root mean squared error would be considerable.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 4:49 PM Jeroen Kools notifications@github.com wrote:
I read that some of your numbers are 5-day centered moving averages with ESTIMATES for the following 2 days.
Where did you read that?
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/CSSEGISandData/COVID-19/issues/1876#issuecomment-608151283, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/APAZYCWAYG2VZDSF3X6F4NDRKUP73ANCNFSM4LZSGMKQ .
--
Debra J. Roubik
VisionEcon
Your Small Business Resource: Business plans, financial models, funding assistance, market research, market strategy and feasibility studies
623-340-4048 <(623)%20340-4048>
droubik@visionecon.net
So it's averaged in that visualization... Not in the data source.
Thanks Jeroen. But, what makes your data so much higher than WHO even with the lags?
On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 5:06 PM Jeroen Kools notifications@github.com wrote:
So it's averaged in that visualization... Not in the data source.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/CSSEGISandData/COVID-19/issues/1876#issuecomment-608157137, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/APAZYCVQ6DHMRCKCGFZWMPLRKUSAJANCNFSM4LZSGMKQ .
--
Debra J. Roubik
VisionEcon
Your Small Business Resource: Business plans, financial models, funding assistance, market research, market strategy and feasibility studies
623-340-4048 <(623)%20340-4048>
droubik@visionecon.net
Comparing JHU with WHO and Worldometers data for April 2:
WHO | JHU | Worldometers.info | |
---|---|---|---|
China | 82,724 | 82,432 | 81,589 |
US | 187,302 | 243,453 | 244,433 |
Iran | 47,593 | 50,468 | 50,468 |
Italy | 110,574 | 115,242 | 115,242 |
Spain | 102,136 | 112,065 | 112,065 |
I guess there are some discrepancies, noticeably so for the US. FWIW, the CDC reported 213,144 for 4/2, which is very close to JHU's 213,372 for 4/1! And the WHO's 187k is very close to JHU's 188,172 for 3/31. So it looks like the WHO and CDC are lagging behind.
It's also possible JHU is counting something double due to their earlier issues with information per US state, county and cities.
Dear John Hopkins staff:
It is disconcerting that you have no contact information for your data. While I understand that you are pulling data from WHO, CDC and the states-- your daily numbers are showing a totally different trajectory than WHO, CDC and the state health organizations that I follow.
I read that some of your numbers are 5-day centered moving averages with ESTIMATES for the following 2 days. Could your estimates be off? How do you calculate those?
Any input would be appreciated.
Debra Roubik Economist VisionEcon