Closed laurenechan closed 3 years ago
This is generally ok, but arent these synonyms exact?
@matentzn The original issue from Paul stated "In radiation science we use "target" which while actually being broader in some senses is probably better for the sense of the concept. So "exposure target" would be better. An alternative would be "exposure recipient" but this is not great."
I just went with his statement of it being 'broader', but I can adjust to exact if that is preferred. I don't think I fully understand the similarities or differences between the terminologies, they do seem like they could be exact.
In any case I approve of the PR, if you are happy with the synonym types it's fine. I don't really think it's that important in this case!
I think its fine to have it as exact in this case
@diatomsRcool @matentzn Great, I've updated to exact. I do not have write privileges for ExO currently. Are either of you able to grant me write access and/or to approve and merge this PR?
I dont!
I think the synonym types are fine in this case, and I've merged the commits.
Including two related synonyms to the term exposure receptor per a request on ECTO. https://github.com/EnvironmentOntology/environmental-exposure-ontology/issues/165
No option to select broad synonym so included 'has_related_synonym'
Hopefully this looks better @matentzn ?