Closed chaozg closed 8 months ago
Many thanks for the update @nabriis, I believe we agreed that @chaozg would do the first review now. I did take a quick look and noticed that you had some nice "run test" scripts illustrating intended use that were removed in https://github.com/CUQI-DTU/CUQIpy/pull/356/commits/afbd63cb7fbb1b54abbc19dd24300b502372e66e. To speed up review it'd be incredibly helpful, at least for me, if you can reinclude these, for example put them, maybe merged into a single script, in the demos/ folder of this repo.
@jakobsj Good suggestion. I re-wrote a demo script.
@chaozg I could not directly add you as reviewer. But please review :)
Hello @chaozg and @jakobsj. Great points raised. I created issue #378 for most of the raised points. I did refactor into experimental module though. I would say this is ready for final approval
Hi @amal-ghamdi. I added issue #379 for most of your specific comments. I think it is best we fix that specific thing in a seperate issue as I think it is a larger issue than one would think.
Closes #365
I suggest looking at added demo file, the SamplerNew class and the added unit tests to get an idea of the changes first.
Issues to be raised but not resolved were added to #378