pywrap does not work

[gsohler]

Hi Following your documentation, i run:

pywrap -i /usr/include/clang/ -l /usr/lib64/libclang.so all ocp.toml but get this error finally:

clang.cindex.LibclangError: /usr/lib64/libclang.so: undefined symbol: clang_CXXMethod_isDeleted. Please ensure that your python bindings are compatible with your libclang.so version.

and I got few questions:

• which tool did output this error ? i could not find this text in the pywrap sources
• What is this version equality about ? how can i check both versions and how can i best make sure that they are equal ?

Thank you :)

[adam-urbanczyk]

CI says it does work. This tool is not really meant to be used by general public, better download release package with sources. If you really want to try, then take a look at the CI pipeline, but you'll be mostly on your own.

[gsohler]

Hi Adam, the shown error is mainly due to version mismatch, but this probably never happened to yo the CI pipeline.

I'd like to use cadquery_ocp in build123d and build123d in my openscad fork which understands python. (http://github.com/gsohler/openscad)

Now the issue is the openscad repeatedly starts and stops the python enginge(to make sure that there are no old results) python is quit with Py_FinalizeEx() but this issue is that this does not for the python modules which are linked with pywrap. if pywrap is derived from pybind11 it probably also has this problem:

if i start python the 2nd time from within the same program start, i get errors like: ImportError: generic_type: type "BRepLib_ShellError" is already registered!

issue, is that the generic type is still registerd in the pwrap/pybind11 To fix this, pywrap could replaced the saved type with the new type instead of throwing an error.

something like this in pybind11.h. what do you think ?

[gsohler@fedora pybind11]$ diff pybind11.h pybind11.h.fix 1355,1359d1354 < if ((rec.module_local ? get_local_type_info(rec.type) : get_global_type_info(rec.type)) < != nullptr) { < pybind11_fail("generic_type: type \"" + std::string(rec.name) < + "\" is already registered!"); < } 1381,1382c1376,1386 < if (rec.module_local) { < get_local_internals().registered_types_cpp[tindex] = tinfo;

auto &old_tinfo = (rec.module_local ? get_local_type_info(rec.type) : get_global_type_info(rec.type)); if (old_tinfo != nullptr) { // exist already if (self_value_and_holder) { self_value_and_holder.type->dealloc(self_value_and_holder); old_tinfo.dealloc(); //self_Value_and_holder.type = old_tinfo } oldinfo=tinfo; // pybind11_fail("generic_type: type \"" + std::string(rec.name) // + "\" is already registered!"); 1384,1385c1388,1394 < internals.registered_types_cpp[tindex] = tinfo; < }

      if (rec.module_local) {
          get_local_internals().registered_types_cpp[tindex] = tinfo;
      } else {
          internals.registered_types_cpp[tindex] = tinfo;
      }

}

[adam-urbanczyk]

It does not look like you need to regenerate the bindings, so just use the released sources. Regarding pybind11, I really don't know, try asking on their issue tracker. Quick search yields this: https://github.com/pybind/pybind11/issues/1925 , so you are probably out of luck.