Caleydo / mothertable

Mothertable Project @JKU-ICG 💬 @katush @mijar
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
1 stars 0 forks source link

Poster screenshot #391

Closed katush closed 7 years ago

katush commented 7 years ago

image

URL here

I tried to find attributes that would have nice values and thus it would be easy to see what is going on.

Reproduction steps:

  1. Add the second N. new HIV infections matrix and aggregate by mean.
  2. Reorder the columns - AIDS_Countries first, Discriminatory attitude and Urban population last, (other things seem to be in order)
  3. Filter out Oceania and South America
  4. Filter out values lover than 24 from People knowing they have HIV. Also fiters out NaN values.
  5. Re-add the matrix attributes: HAART availability, Decades, AIDS_Years, in this order. There seems to be a bug, so after loading url, they are gone from table view.
  6. Change visual encoding of Urban Population - unaggregated to prop. symbol, aggregated to boxplot.
  7. Aggregate everything except Asia

Issues:

sgratzl commented 7 years ago
katush commented 7 years ago

@sgratzl

AIDS_Years on the first matrix

it is the matrix of new infections per year X per country, all of the matrices are year X country. Or do you mean the barplot visualization itself?

maybe stratify the first matrix for showing this feature, too

It is stratified by continent and than parts are aggregated. If we stratify it lover in the hierarchy, than we will have several groups per continent as well. But we can show more Continents. (I filtered out more values to reduce height)

image

sgratzl commented 7 years ago

AIDS_Years on the first matrix

it is the matrix of new infections per year X per country, all of the matrices are year X country. Or do you mean the barplot visualization itself?

I mean the attribute on top of the first matrix which is clearly increasing linearly without any useful information

It is stratified by continent and than parts are aggregated.

I meant stratifing the matrix in the other direction e.g., by decades

katush commented 7 years ago

@sam it makes sense to have the matrix sorted by years, as it is time series. Moreover, all these attributes are time sequential (decades, availability of treatments) as well, so stratification and sorting by them won't change the visual appearance (unless you set one ascending and other descending, which makes no sense in this case)

thinkh commented 7 years ago

Side note: You can create screenshots with the exact same size using Google Chrome Dev Tools.

mijar commented 7 years ago

there is a known problem of having homogeneous matrices whose columns are time stamps - they should be always sorted by the time (imho) and the categories above the matrix are in fact just indicators of some periods...and might help with understanding the data with stratification. possible solution now - just hide the div via Dev Tools and not include it in the figure, but it will be sorted time-respectively thanks to it... possible future solution - indicate in the json with data specs that the matrix is a time-series...and then always keep the order