Closed Cali0707 closed 11 months ago
@Leo6Leo do you think it would be okay to merge this since the remaining issue is captured in https://github.com/Cali0707/git-utils/issues/16?
@Leo6Leo do you think it would be okay to merge this since the remaining issue is captured in #16?
if [[ ":$PATH:" == ":$HOME/bin:" ]]; then echo "Your path is correctly set" else echo "Your path is missing ~/bin, you might want to add it." exit 1 fi
I think I cannot test the remaining part of this PR because I attempt to resolve the path missing issue by creating the bin folder in my home directory, but it doesn't solve the problem. @Cali0707
@Leo6Leo can you send me the contents produced by echo $PATH
? No need to send on github if its something you want to keep private, maybe slack?
@Cali0707 yep, sent it on cncf slack
~/Leo: git clonefork
curl: (2) no URL specified!
curl: try 'curl --help' or 'curl --manual' for more information
fatal: You must specify a repository to clone.
usage: git clone [<options>] [--] <repo> [<dir>]
-v, --verbose be more verbose
-q, --quiet be more quiet
--progress force progress reporting
--reject-shallow don't clone shallow repository
-n, --no-checkout don't create a checkout
--bare create a bare repository
--mirror create a mirror repository (implies bare)
-l, --local to clone from a local repository
--no-hardlinks don't use local hardlinks, always copy
-s, --shared setup as shared repository
--recurse-submodules[=<pathspec>]
initialize submodules in the clone
--recursive ... alias of --recurse-submodules
-j, --jobs <n> number of submodules cloned in parallel
--template <template-directory>
directory from which templates will be used
--reference <repo> reference repository
--reference-if-able <repo>
reference repository
--dissociate use --reference only while cloning
-o, --origin <name> use <name> instead of 'origin' to track upstream
-b, --branch <branch>
checkout <branch> instead of the remote's HEAD
-u, --upload-pack <path>
path to git-upload-pack on the remote
--depth <depth> create a shallow clone of that depth
--shallow-since <time>
create a shallow clone since a specific time
--shallow-exclude <revision>
deepen history of shallow clone, excluding rev
--single-branch clone only one branch, HEAD or --branch
--no-tags don't clone any tags, and make later fetches not to follow them
--shallow-submodules any cloned submodules will be shallow
--separate-git-dir <gitdir>
separate git dir from working tree
-c, --config <key=value>
set config inside the new repository
--server-option <server-specific>
option to transmit
-4, --ipv4 use IPv4 addresses only
-6, --ipv6 use IPv6 addresses only
--filter <args> object filtering
--also-filter-submodules
apply partial clone filters to submodules
--remote-submodules any cloned submodules will use their remote-tracking branch
--sparse initialize sparse-checkout file to include only files at root
usage: git remote add [<options>] <name> <url>
-f, --fetch fetch the remote branches
--tags import all tags and associated objects when fetching
or do not fetch any tag at all (--no-tags)
-t, --track <branch> branch(es) to track
-m, --master <branch>
master branch
--mirror[=(push|fetch)]
set up remote as a mirror to push to or fetch from
error: No such remote 'upstream'
Do you want to mute this error log and we have our own error log? The current log might cause some confusion to the user. What do you think @Cali0707
@Leo6Leo I think we could maybe do this, but this isnt a MacOS bug, this is just saying that you didn't provide a URL to git clonefork. So maybe open this as a bug in a separate issue? You would get the same behaviour on linux.
Currently, clonefork only supports cloning by the remote URL:
git clonefork {REMOTE_ORIGIN_URL}
@Leo6Leo I think we could maybe do this, but this isnt a MacOS bug, this is just saying that you didn't provide a URL to git clonefork. So maybe open this as a bug in a separate issue? You would get the same behaviour on linux
Yes this is not a MacOS only issue. ok let's create a new issue for this. So we customize our command error and instruction. @Cali0707
@Leo6Leo I think we could maybe do this, but this isnt a MacOS bug, this is just saying that you didn't provide a URL to git clonefork. So maybe open this as a bug in a separate issue? You would get the same behaviour on linux.
Currently, clonefork only supports cloning by the remote URL:
git clonefork {REMOTE_ORIGIN_URL}
Yeah I intentionally miss the URL. What I want to say is that the error logs currently contains
usage: git remote add [<options>] <name> <url>
usage: git clone [<options>] [--] <repo> [<dir>]
Which might make user confuse if they haven't used git that much u know @Cali0707
@Leo6Leo I think we could maybe do this, but this isnt a MacOS bug, this is just saying that you didn't provide a URL to git clonefork. So maybe open this as a bug in a separate issue? You would get the same behaviour on linux. Currently, clonefork only supports cloning by the remote URL:
git clonefork {REMOTE_ORIGIN_URL}
Yeah I intentionally miss the URL. What I want to say is that the error logs currently contains
usage: git remote add [<options>] <name> <url>
usage: git clone [<options>] [--] <repo> [<dir>]
Which might make user confuse if they haven't used git that much u know @Cali0707
yeah good point, let's definitely capture this in a new issue then!
since this is a non-MacOS bug, do you think this PR is good to merge?
/lgtm /approve
Fixes #10
With this change, I am comfortable saying that this supports MacOS as the only dependency needed on mac is
jq
which we are now testing for in the installation.