California-Data-Collaborative / CA-Stormwater-Data-Challenge

Visualize potential dry-weather runoff contributing areas to identify prioritization for areas to target
15 stars 11 forks source link

Update on Data Needs #7

Closed amandaaprahamian closed 7 years ago

amandaaprahamian commented 7 years ago

An update for Issue #2:

1. x miles from the beach - @leighphan could we calculate this using mapbox? @monobina had said it would be easy to calculate using the geoid in GIS.

2. xxxx landscaped area - this link has irr_area_sf (Irrigated Area of the Household). We should use the average for water year 2015-2016. @monobina when is this data from? The last census?

3. xxx people - this link has hhsize (Household Size). We should use the average for water year 2015-2016. @monobina when is this data from? The last census?

4. xxx water saving improvements - @monobina any updates for #'s 4 - 8? 5. total savings of $XXX 6. competition details 7. Your address is eligible for the XXX rebate program 8. Here’s your goal: xxxxxx xxx xxxx

9. Text and photos regarding stormdrain education (ex: Remember, your stormdrains drain excess outdoor watering directly to the ocean, this outfall drains your neighborhood water into the nearest stream…see photos here...) - @amandaaprahamian will work with OCPW to determine the best verbage for here.

New (see Issue #6)

patwater commented 7 years ago

Nothing to add though just want to say this is a great job breaking down the tasks and advancing the project!

monobina commented 7 years ago

@amandaaprahamian I think for both (2) and (3), landscape area & household size, is aggregated from our billing data. It's a time series starting from 2011 going upto 2016 @christophertull please correct me if I am wrong on this.

monobina commented 7 years ago

@christophertull do you have a cleaned up date for 4-6 that @amandaaprahamian is asking for? If not we can work on this data to get it out to them

monobina commented 7 years ago

@amandaaprahamian can you elaborate a bit more on your requirements for 4-6? Are you looking for a yearly information on this for the past year? I am not sure how much granular we can get on this data.

patwater commented 7 years ago

For the turf water savings and cost effectiveness numbers you could always use this study or the one UCR did: Final water savings of turf removal KDD (CaDC).pdf

christophertull commented 7 years ago

Yes, @monobina is correct about points 2/3. This is landscape area and household size for each customer from MNWD billing system and then aggregated up to the block level.

re: 4-6, we have your rebate data in a clean form from 2008 - Jan 2016. How much of that is public and could be shared? Could imagine doing something like aggregating the counts of different rebate types, or summing over dollars of rebates issued.

monobina commented 7 years ago

Thanks @patwater @christophertull . Yes, those studies might be useful. I don't think customer level data is public. We can aggregate it to the census block level for the variables - number of rebate programs offered, average price of rebate, number of participants etc. @amandaaprahamian do you think a data with these info will be helpful or any other thoughts/suggestions?

patwater commented 7 years ago

@amandaaprahamian @leighphan circling back to see what else you need on this :)