Week 4

[CalissaT]

• FRQ Link
• Iteration Lab/2D Array Link
  • 1 fish, 2 fish, red fish, blue fish

[AkhilNandhakumar]

Great teanwork, including comments for each person's tickets

Evan explained FRQ well, hit each requirement given by the question Calissa talked about 2019 frq which meet the scoring guidelines Kian explained his FRQ well and Samuel included lots of comments in his code, used test data to create an output - individual work

didnt have a fully updated 2d array page hacks were not fully completed

2.7 for all

[Saathvika-Ajith]

2.7+/3 for everyone

• had a scrum board with comments
• finished the FRQs and explained process
• completed iteration lab with changes to code and hacks

[horizon-ab]

Grade: 2.7

• FRQ 2018 (Calissa) - good comments and explanation for the code
• FRQ 2019 (Evan) - Used sources, went over each method
• FRQ 2016 (Samuel) - Thorough explanation of how code runs
• FRQ 2019 (Kian) - Used sources, good explanations Could be more collaboration for FRQs, mostly individual work here
• Extra ASCII art and poems for everyone

Commentator: Bailey Say

[Reem57]

2.7/3.0

• Both pairs had their FRQs done with great explanation
• All of them had their 2D Array work

[supermengman]

• Scrum board and organization for team
• calculations explanations in the APCalendar
• FRQ explanation of ArrayList and random numbers clear
• new ASCII art, creative rhymes (Mr morts monkeys)
• overall solid explanations and meets requirements

2.7+/3

[jm1021]

Calissa - introduced scrum board and real nice comment dialogue.

Evan step tracker - discussed Class definitions, variables, and methods. Changed Monkeys and horizontal. 2.7 Calissa - did leap year problem discussed problem and challenges. Monkeys to Fish and reduced some logic. 2.7 Kian - game and score, shows and score in conditionals and bonus score. also, made best score algo. Monkeys to Apples. 2.7 Samuel - string array and find, nice comments and technical description. This problem was new to me. Switched ASCII art and went horizontal. 2.8 better runtime examples throughout.

[RohanG326]

Rohan Gaikwad Grade: 2.7 Evan FRQ: Well done, showed a good understanding of the code and what the FRQ was asking Evan 2D array: better monkeys, horizontal Calissa FRQ: good comments in code, good explanations of the code Calissa 2D array: fairly basic, but works Kian FRQ: good explanation of how the code works, good citations of the sources Kian 2D array: apples, fairly basic Samuel FRQ: good use of test cases and explanations of the FRQ Samuel 2D array: did backwards

Overall:

• Could be more collaborative, everyone did mostly individual work, and everyone could have just given some background of what the FRQ was

[nicm2]

• work on scrum board to enable collaboration
• good explanations to frq could have done more team work
• creative 2d array labs
• new ASCII at and poems

Overall: good work and explanations, could have been more callaborative

2.7

[bgt072105]

Score: 2.7+/3 for everyone

• Established scrum board
• Good explanation of each FRQ
• Nice overview of iteration labs

[jz21324]

2.7/3 for all

• Good 2D arrays for everyone
• All FRQs explained well
• Overall met all expectations

[ellenjxu]

2.7/3

• Good explanations and complete iteration lab
• Met expectations, good scrum board
• Could have been more clear in presentation