Closed sean-reed closed 4 years ago
The goal was to check for proportional hazards easily. Thinking out loud: why I am plotting against log(t) anyways? I think that's a mistake tbh. What do you think?
For checking proportional hazards I don't think it matters too much as the curves will be parallel either way if the assumption holds since it's just a different scaling of time. I think it's still useful to plot either log(t) on a linear axis or t on log axis (as it is now) though, as then Weibull distributed survival times should appear as an approximately straight line.
On that second point, may also be useful to have the option to have the confidence intervals included in the plot? I don't think it's an option at the moment? Idea being that if it's possible to draw a straight line within the confidence interval, then it's consistent with Weibull distributed.
For checking proportional hazards I don't think it matters too much as the curves will be parallel either way if the assumption holds since it's just a different scaling of time.
Yes that's true.
The whole MPL-doing-log-axes is just confusing, my suggestion would be to put both on a linear axes and plot log(-log(S)) against log(t), labelled as such. Does that make sense?
Yes, sounds good to me.
The docstring says this function gives a plot of log(S(t)) against log(t) but it actually produces a plot of log(-log(S(t))) (correctly labelled on y-axis) against t (incorrectly labelled as log(t)) with a linear-scaled y-axis and log-scaled x-axis.
I can submit a fix for this but, assuming the intention of this function is to produce a straight line plot for Weibull distributed survival times, there are various solutions:
(a) Plot -log(S(t)) against t, with log-scaled x and y axes. (b) Plot -log(S(t)) against log(t), with linear-scaled x-axis and log-scaled y-axis. (c) Plot log(-log(S(t)) against log(t), with linear-scaled x and y axes.
My suggestion is solution (b) as it's closest to the current function name and docstring.