Open CamDavidsonPilon opened 6 years ago
Sure. You would resample with replacement for each group, fit a KM, get median survival, then repeat. One issue with that particular example though is the sample size is a little small, bootstrapping is a large sample method. There are a few ways to get the CI after, but I would advocate for taking the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles to get the 95% CI
As far as I know, this doesn't violate the regularity assumptions of bootstrapping, and as long as all data is independent its fine. Violating of the regularity assumption occurs in machine learning approaches
Although, you don't really even need to do bootstrapping. You could take the median estimate of both groups, the number in each group, and the standard error from Greenwood's formula. From these items you can just directly get the 95% CI of the difference in median survival times. Again, a large sample method
This is a good start for more general CI for percentiles: http://www.mas.ncl.ac.uk/~nmf16/teaching/mas3311/week07.pdf
One question: if the RMST method isn't yet supported in lifelines, what is the preferred method to statistically compare survival of 2 different groups?
Probably the statistics.logrank_test
- but if you are interested in comparing at a precise point in time, then statistics.survival_difference_at_fixed_point_in_time_test
.
https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/336873/how-to-calculate-the-confidence-interval-around-difference-in-median-survival-ti