Closed jwallwork23 closed 2 months ago
Good idea. Would it be worth having an alias for it as well called torch_array_from_tensor
?
Good idea. Would it be worth having an alias for it as well called
torch_array_from_tensor
?
Sure, I guess torch_array_to_tensor
would then complete the set.
Inderdaad.
Interesting, I always read it as being "create a torch_tensor
from a fortran_array
" and this is how we refer to things in our docs - and we have an object called a torch_tensor
.
I feel like torch_array
from tensor
could be ambiguous on this front.
However, I feel like all our routines all being prepended with torch_
is nice too...
FTorch implements
torch_tensor_from_array
to map Fortran arrays to (F)Torch tensors. It would be useful to have the reverse mapping, too.This would provide a way to get around the issue mentioned in #139.