CanberraOceanRacingClub / namadgi3

Maintenance management system for Namadgi 3
1 stars 2 forks source link

Engine & Saildrive - 250hr Service due 3900 hrs #696

Closed pcbaston closed 9 months ago

pcbaston commented 1 year ago

Previous service performed at Opua, NZ by Seapower April 2023 at 3276hrs.

New issue for next service interval. 500hr service due @ 3775hrs.

smr547 commented 9 months ago

@delcosta reports:

Service done at Port Moselle

early August at engine hours 3651 hrs. Updating the title of this issue -- service now due 3900hrs

Thanks for the report Sam.

pcbaston commented 9 months ago

Concur. Sam had the engine serviced as I had advised him during his cruise in Fiji. There is no method, other than someone remembering, to trigger an engine/saildrive service.

I propose we add this important information to the Skipper's handover notes, so that incoming skippers are advised how many engine hours are remaining until a service is due (every 250 hours as agreed by CORC committee previously). This would negate the need for a GITHUB Issue and put the onus on the Skippers. ie: if there are less than 50 hours remaining, someone SHOULD be asking when the engine service is booked for.

My thoughts...

Paul Baston

On Thu, 28 Sept 2023 at 13:57, Steven Ring @.***> wrote:

@delcosta https://github.com/delcosta reports:

Service done at Port Moselle

early August at engine hours 3651 hrs. Updating the title of this issue -- service now due 3900hrs

Thanks for the report Sam.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/CanberraOceanRacingClub/namadgi3/issues/696#issuecomment-1738397164, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A4W7HMGLAPIJOANJ7CYWYSDX4TYRJANCNFSM6AAAAAAWUALBMI . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>

smr547 commented 9 months ago

It's a good idea that we put the onus back onto the current skipper to organise an engine service

@peterottesen @delcosta @DimitD

pcbaston commented 9 months ago

I did not mean to put the onus to arrange the service, but to be aware that a service is due and to speak to someone (Maintenance Manager most likely) to arrange with a recognised supplier to have the service done - obviously in concert with the skipper at the time - who may have to return to port a day ahead of schedule to have the service done. Unfortunately, it would be difficult to predict when a day could be made available for such maintenance when the vessel is being used through the booking system (especially when out of SYdney area).

Regards,

Paul Baston

On Fri, 29 Sept 2023 at 08:54, Steven Ring @.***> wrote:

It's a good idea that we put the onus back onto the current skipper to organise an engine service

@peterottesen https://github.com/peterottesen @delcosta https://github.com/delcosta @DimitD https://github.com/DimitD

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/CanberraOceanRacingClub/namadgi3/issues/696#issuecomment-1740099398, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A4W7HMHW3M5S2VDWSBKOLLLX4X5Y3ANCNFSM6AAAAAAWUALBMI . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>

smr547 commented 9 months ago

Noted that this is a duplicate of #214 -- closing this issue and updating title of #214