Closed CotterpinDoozer closed 2 years ago
By discussing with Joonas, we will use the structure in this fall, like: The user should have "my/path/nordcan/nordcan_archive/", "my/path/nordcan/nordcan_2018", "my/path/nordcan/nordcan_2019", etc.
Please look also at this comment from Joonas from him running the R-modules for production:
the defaults / examples
directory for saving the output of NORDCAN processing.
dir_result <- "path/to/nordcan2019/"
directory for holding the archived (.zip) result.
dir_archive <- "path/to/nordcan2019/"
should not be the same. I found it confusing. better to instead have e.g.
directory for saving the output of NORDCAN processing.
dir_result <- "path/to/nordcan2019/"
directory for holding the archived (.zip) result.
dir_archive <- "path/to/nordcan_archive/"
what's the difference between path_nordcan and dir_results?
Can you make sure this is also handled and that the last question is answered (if you have not already talked to Joonas about this).
Huidong will look more into this issue and check communication with Joonas in Slack.
I recommend users have their NORDCAN project structure like: -nordcan_archive -nordcan_2018 -nordcan_2019
Folder "nordcan_archive" contains previously calculated results in .zip format. Folder "nordcan_20**" contains user instruction, cancer related data, iarccrgtools, calculated result, etc.
Joonas writes: quite many paths are now defined manually in nordcan.R by the user. any way to trim them down?
We will look at this task for the autumn version.