I am a little concerned by the perf impact of such a change (i.e. not listing pixels but the dataframe used for the "pixel sets export") but let's see. It works correctly locally, and we will see with larger/real data.
Coverage increased (+0.008%) to 99.581% when pulling e40585789898b27b04db73110d1ac16dace3e4d6 on dataframe into e42ad2d231bd5b65d776a283e16e5947d80736f3 on master.
Refs #229
I am a little concerned by the perf impact of such a change (i.e. not listing pixels but the dataframe used for the "pixel sets export") but let's see. It works correctly locally, and we will see with larger/real data.