Open CorvusPrudens opened 3 weeks ago
it's possible this is impractical
This would require some work but is doable. Biggest problem for me today is finding time.
I am working on bacon-ls 0.4.0, but when I am done with the release, I have some time to start the MR and try to work on it.
@crisidev I'm working on designing a new version of the analyzer framework, in accordance with this roadmap. Please come chat about what you intend to do exactly before starting a PR.
Nice, I'll join the chat to see if I can help.
After reading the roadmap, I think I can help updating the analyzers for cargo using json output, to provide precise locations.
This issue is motivated by crisidev/bacon-ls#2.
bacon's locations export doesn't surface enough information to fully describe spans in an editor. From my quick investigation, I believe this is because bacon simply parses the direct output of
check
andclippy
, but do correct me if I'm wrong.However, both tools can provide much more information with their JSON message formats as described here. As far as I can tell,
json-diagnostic-rendered-ansi
provides the best of both worlds by providing detailed information along with fully rendered messages.I don't know what the scope of such a change would be, so it's possible this is impractical. However, while it may seem a little roundabout, I've found using bacon in this way very refreshing and more reliable than rust-analyzer for my larger projects. It would be amazing if we could get accurate spans to boot!