Open PonteIneptique opened 7 years ago
Could you have a look @sonofmun ?
I will take a look at it when I get a chance.
@PonteIneptique What is the status of this issue? Were these perhaps texts that had empty references and thus were not parsable even though they passed Hook? Or is the problem somewhere else?
I have never chased down this issue unfortunately. It should definitely be checked :)
The question is whether they error now that Hook checks for empty refs. This was the type of problem that led me to recognize the problem with Hook.
We should have a check on this. I probably won't have time for it this week though .
On https://github.com/PerseusDL/canonical-latinLit phi1017.phi015 passes all tests :
https://travis-ci.org/PerseusDL/canonical-latinLit/builds/278749515#L3461
but is not contained in the release :
https://travis-ci.org/PerseusDL/canonical-latinLit/builds/278749515#L6396-L6400
I have few that could share the same issue :