var style0 = "#layer0 { marker-width:3; }";
var style1 = "#layer1 { line-color:red; }";
which seem as if they are suppose to be the style for each layer, but instead after concatenatation layer0 gets both styles and layer1 gets nothing.
I understand that testing styles wasn't the intent of the test, but when layer name in the cartocss is only a placeholder you are forcing people to provide n style strings for n layers into grainstore, whereas most people typically write cartoCSS with one large file with multiple layers in it.
If that is the intent, then OK. It is just a bit confusing when I am use to the layer name in the cartoCSS refer to the layer id/name in my definition of layers. It would be nice to provide the functionality to filter a block of style to a layer if the layer id exists in cartoCSS, for example in the above if a layer in the ids array was layer0 it would then use only that section as its style.
jaakla
commented
7 years ago
The test Uses correct layer name for interactivity layer defines two styles:
which seem as if they are suppose to be the style for each layer, but instead after concatenatation layer0 gets both styles and layer1 gets nothing.
I understand that testing styles wasn't the intent of the test, but when layer name in the cartocss is only a placeholder you are forcing people to provide n style strings for n layers into grainstore, whereas most people typically write cartoCSS with one large file with multiple layers in it.
If that is the intent, then OK. It is just a bit confusing when I am use to the layer name in the cartoCSS refer to the layer id/name in my definition of layers. It would be nice to provide the functionality to filter a block of style to a layer if the layer id exists in cartoCSS, for example in the above if a layer in the ids array was
layer0it would then use only that section as its style.