Closed jgoizueta closed 3 years ago
I see the tests for 9.5, 9.6 failed because ‘DefElem {aka struct DefElem}’ has no member named ‘location’. I guess that field was introduced in PG 10 🤦
Well, maybe I'l do the options filtering only for PG>=10, which is the use case we're interested on.
I see the tests for 9.5, 9.6 failed because ‘DefElem {aka struct DefElem}’ has no member named ‘location’. I guess that field was introduced in PG 10 facepalm
Maybe it's a good time to drop 9.5 and 9.6 (and clean related code). We don't use them any more.
Yeah, I think it's time to drop 9.X: https://app.clubhouse.io/cartoteam/story/113666/drop-support-for-pg-10-in-odbc-fdw
The CREATE FOREIGN TABLE statements generated by IMPORT FOREIGN SCHEMA contain all the OPTIONS defined in the corresponding SERVER and USER MAPPING.
This is a potencial privacy problem, since USER MAPPING options can be confidential (passwords, ...) and when they are inserted in an statement to be executed the could be revealed through error (or debug) messages.