Open rochoa opened 9 years ago
I think in Torque the change would be easy to perform, and I like better torque.json
. Are there any other implications apart from changing the provider in Torque, @javisantana ?
no, but we'd need to keep backwards compatibility in the tiler
Windshaft will support both.
so that's ok, we can change it
I was wondering why I had the idea of calling json.torque instead of torque.json in the same way utfgrid is grid.json. That's why code reviews are good
Windshaft provider requests torque tiles with
json.torque
format/extension: https://github.com/CartoDB/torque/blob/2.11.3/lib/torque/provider/windshaft.js#L478To be more consistent, could we change that to
torque.json
?