Closed FanY1999 closed 3 years ago
Hi, for PubMed dataset, we used the preprocessed data from previous work: N-ary Relation Extraction using Graph State LSTM (EMNLP2018). We did not use any other dependency parsers to get the dependency tree. I am not sure which version of the tool they used to get the result.
Thank you.
So,can I understand your work in this way: For the two different tasks ,namely, cross-sentence and sentence-level, except that the input content is not the same, specifically, the stanford_head field is different, and the other processing procedures are basically the same.
Close this issue. Feel free to re-open it if you have further questions.
hello, when I tried to generate the two fields(stanford_head and stanford_deprel) with the stanfordnlp tool,and converted the result into a recognizable pattern for your code, I found a little difference between my results and yours(pubmed dataset).
for example, the sentence"2. acquired resistance mechanism 1 ) secondary t790m mutation of the egfr gene unfortunately , many of those patient who originally had respond eventually become insensitive to gefitinib or erlotinib therapy through acquire resistance ."
my output: your output:
we can see that,in your output ,there're many "-1" value and "self" content.
So,I wonder how do you get the output?Is it because our tool versions are different?