How to assert reviewed "records"

[mdoering]

Trust in data quality is key and ideally there is a general way at least for all contributing datasets to the CoL to indicate if an individual record has been reviewed by an expert. Questions to be addressed:

• what gets reviewed/asserted?
  • an entire taxon with all its synonyms
  • a single name usage, i.e. synonym or taxon separately
  • each entity "record" in e.g. ColDP, i.e. type specimen, reference, name relation, vernacular name, etc
• what data type is "reviewed". Is it a simple boolean, a date, an experts name (with an additional date?), a team of experts, free text vs ORCIDs, additional remarks, an enumeration (NOT REVIEWED, DOUBTFUL, CORRECT, ...)
• how does this relate to scrutinizer and scrutinizerDate which we have in ACEF and ColDP already on the taxon level

[mdoering]

we do already have a "REVIEWED" decision mode that we use to tick off names in the CoL