Open sharifX opened 3 years ago
we plan to offer this in a second step/service, which also makes use of the classification to disambiguate various potential matches. Similar to the GBIF species matching. Only with a classification it makes sense to offer generic fuzzy matching, otherwise the false positives are just too many.
Hopefully by the end of the year this is in place...
Often data from the field contains typos and spelling mistakes. For example, Vicia fava instead of Vicia faba ("Fava Bean" shows up as a vernacular name in the check list).
It would be nice if this can be flagged somehow during a name-matching step instead of matching type "none".