Regression for Parisoma Swainson, 1832

[ahahn-gbif]

At species level (where available), Parisoma is listed as a synonym of Sylvia. This seems to be lost, compared to the previous version.

{
  "count": 12830,
  "verbatim_taxonID": "null",
  "verbatim_taxonConceptID": "null",
  "verbatim_scientificNameID": "null",
  "verbatim_kingdom": "Animalia",
  "verbatim_phylum": "Chordata",
  "verbatim_class": "Aves",
  "verbatim_order": "null",
  "verbatim_family": "null",
  "verbatim_genus": "Parisoma",
  "verbatim_species": "subcaeruleum",
  "verbatim_infra": "null",
  "verbatim_rank": "null",
  "verbatim_verbatimRank": "null",
  "verbatim_scientificName": "Parisoma subcaeruleum",
  "verbatim_generic": "null",
  "verbatim_author": "null",
  "current_kingdom": "Animalia",
  "current_phylum": "Chordata",
  "current_class": "Aves",
  "current_order": "Passeriformes",
  "current_family": "Sylviidae",
  "current_genus": "Sylvia",
  "current_subGenus": "null",
  "current_species": "null",
  "current_scientificName": "Parisoma Swainson, 1832",
  "current_acceptedScientificName": "Sylvia Scopoli, 1769",
  "proposed_kingdom": "Animalia",
  "proposed_phylum": "Chordata",
  "proposed_class": "Aves",
  "proposed_order": "null",
  "proposed_family": "null",
  "proposed_genus": "null",
  "proposed_subGenus": "null",
  "proposed_species": "null",
  "proposed_scientificName": "Aves",
  "proposed_acceptedScientificName": "Aves",
  "debug_url": "http://backbonebuild-vh.gbif.org:9101/v2/species/match?&kingdom=Animalia&phylum=Chordata&class=Aves&genus=Parisoma&scientificName=Parisoma subcaeruleum&specificEpithet=subcaeruleum&strict=false",
  "_key": 17962,
  "changes": {
    "order": true,
    "family": true,
    "genus": true,
    "scientificName": true,
    "acceptedScientificName": true
  },
  "reviewed": false
}

[DianRHR]

Any of the sources, either COL or xRelease includes Parisoma or Parisoma subcaeruleum. The sources available in CLB that include this genus don't meet the quality standard to include them. The mathching and the impact tool are working fine in this case.