Open yroskov opened 2 years ago
Resolved 2021-10-11:
Synced 2021-10-11
Example genera: Porotermes Hagen, 1858 Stolotermes Hagen, 1858 also Allotermes, Bicornitermes, Bifiditermes, Calcaritermes, Ceratokalotermes, etc.
Placement in TW looks correct to me (Porotermes, Allotermes): https://sfg.taxonworks.org/tasks/nomenclature/browse?taxon_name_id=444558
New export 2022-02-16 from https://sfg.taxonworks.org/downloads/298
File isoptera_catalog_coldp_otu_id_585557_2022-02-16t212052+0000 imported 2022-02-16.
New export did not fix issues with genera outside families.
Classification: https://data.catalogueoflife.org/dataset/1198/classification
Because of this missing family, its child subfamily Stolotermitinae (with genus Stolotermes) is in the tree root. It's second child subfamily Porotermitinae (with genera Chilgatermes & Porotermes) is recognized as "bare name" in CLB. as a result, genera Chilgatermes & Porotermes also appear in the tree root.
Illustrations:
TW view (Stolotermes in subfamily Stolotermitinae - family Stolotermitidae):
View in TW (both genera are in Porotermitinae subfamily (in family Stolotermitidae):
OTHER ISSUES IN THE TREE:
The same in TW:
However, there are 5 children genera in TW:
Export of 2022-02-16 was not synced
@gdower: Stolotermitidae has no OTU. That's the problem.
This explains all.
@hhopkins77, could you please add OTU with family Stolotermitidae and its children? (see about our problems above, including a ticket from GBIF: Incorrect family placing of Porotermes and Stolotermes genera gbif/portal-feedback#3898)
New export 2022-02-27 after OTU fix. File isoptera_catalog_coldp_otu_id_585557_2022-02-17t152157+0000 imported 2022-02-27.
Classification:
New export 2022-02-27 after Cretatermitinae OTU fix. File isoptera_catalog_coldp_otu_id_585557_2022-02-17t155655+0000 imported 2022-02-27.
Classification:
[x] Imported: 3068 spp
[x] Metadata: version & date updated as Feb 2022 / 2022-02-17.
[x] Classification: OK
[x] Sector: OK
[x] ISSUES assessed 2022-02-17
TASKS 2022-02-17
Resolved:
Synced 2022-02-17
New versions exported/imported SF->TW 2022-09-05 = release date; imported TW->CLB 2022-09-14; re-imported with fixed extinct flag 2022-10-20 Data taken from localhost:3000.
[x] New importer used. Distribution added. "Looped synonymy" resolved.
[x] Imported: 3080 spp (vs 3062 spp in Aug 2021)
[x] Metadata: version & date updated
[x] Classification: in the Tree root: subfamily †Cretatermitinae (no parent family in the classifiction); empty subgenus Eutermes (Eutermes) Heer, 1849 = blocked
[x] Sector: infraorder Isoptera
ISSUES assessed 2022-10-27
TASKS
Resolved 2022-10-27
Synced 2022-10-27
SF Isoptera of 0.28.1 / 2023-01-03; imported 2023-01-03; re-imported 2023-01-06 from Geoff's laptop "Data taken from localhost:3000; ver. 0.28.1"
ISSUES assessed 2023-01-23:
TASKS resolved 2023-01-06:
Synced 2023-01-06
SF Isoptera of 2023-02-02 / 2023-02-02; imported 2023-02-02 from Geoff's laptop
TASKS
Synced 2023-02-03
SF Isoptera of 0.30.3 / 2023-03-06 ; imported 2023-03-07 from Geoff's laptop
TASKS
Synced 2023-03-08
SF Isoptera of 0.32.2 / 2023-04-12; imported 2023-04-12 from Geoff's laptop
TASKS = ok
Synced 2023-04-17
SF Isoptera of 0.32.3 / 2023-05-10; imported 2023-05-10 from Geoff's laptop
TASKS = ok
Synced 2023-05-11
SF Isoptera of 0.33.1 / 2023-07-13; imported 2023-07-13 from Geoff's laptop
ISSUES assessed 2023-07-14
TASKS
Resolved 2023-07-14:
Synced 2023-07-14
SF Isoptera of 0.34.1 / 2023-08-08; imported 2023-08-08 from Geoff's laptop
TASKS
Resolved 2023-08-09:
Synced 2023-08-09
SF Isoptera of 0.34.3 / 2023-09-06; imported 2023-09-06 from Geoff's laptop
TASKS = no issues
Synced 2023-09-11
SF Isoptera of 0.34.5 / 2023-10-04; imported 2023-10-04, re-imported 2023-10-05 from Geoff's laptop
TASKS = no issues
Synced 2023-10-05
SF Isoptera of 0.35.2 / 2023-11-08; imported 2023-11-09 from Geoff's laptop
ISSUES assessed 2023-11-09
TASKS no issues
Synced 2023-11-09
SF Isoptera of 0.36.0 / 2023-12-07; imported 2023-12-07 from Geoff's laptop
TASKS no issues
Synced 2023-12-07
SF Isoptera of 0.37.0 / 2024-01-02; imported 2024-01-02 from Geoff's laptop
TASKS
Resolved 2024-01-03:
Synced 2024-01-03
SF Isoptera of 0.38.1 / 2024-02-06; imported 2024-02-06 from Geoff's laptop
TASKS no issues
Synced 2024-02-20
SF Isoptera of 0.39.0 / 2024-03-08; imported2024-03-08 from Geoff's laptop
Metrics
TASKS no issues
Synced 2024-03-20
SF Isoptera of 0.40.3 / 2024-04-18; imported 2024-04-18 from Geoff's laptop
Metrics
TASKS
Resolved 2024-04-22:
Synced 2024-04-22
SF Isoptera of 0.41.0 / 2024-05-06; imported 2024-05-06 from Geoff's laptop
Metrics
TASKS no new issues
Synced 2024-05-09
SF Isoptera of 0.41.1 / 2024-06-03; imported 2024-06-03 from Geoff's laptop
Metrics
ISSUES
TASKS
Resolved 2024-06-04:
Synced 2024-06-04
SF Isoptera of 0.42.0 / 2024-07-05; imported 2024-07-05 from Geoff's laptop
Metrics
TASKS
Resolved 2024-07-16:
Synced 2024-07-16
SF Isoptera of 0.43.1 / 2024-08-06; imported 2024-08-06 from Geoff's laptop
Metrics
ISSUES assessed 2024-08-09
TASKS
Resolved 2024-08-09:
Synced 2024-08-09
PREVIEW 2024-08-20 ChecklistBank: 301619
@mdoering, if I am not wrong, Taxonomic coverage is generated by the software, but it is missing in SF Isoptera (both on preview website and production https://www.catalogueoflife.org/data/dataset/1198)
(Note: all other SF checklists have Taxonomic coverage)
@mdoering, I know the problem: sector name was changed in the source as infraorder Termitoidae Latreille, 1802. I am working on this.
@mdoering, hmm, actually all are fine on sector level, and classification string here https://www.catalogueoflife.org/data/taxon/C3V76 is fine. Why it does not appear in Taxonomic coverage?
SF Isoptera of 0.43.2 / 2024-09-06; imported from Geoff's laptop
Metrics
TASKS = no new issues
Synced 2024-09-13
Data of 2021-10-01 taken from sfg.taxonworks.org File Isoptera_coldp_otu_id_585557_2021-10-01T14 26 11+00 00 imported 2021-10-11.
(see DEV report https://github.com/CatalogueOfLife/testing/issues/94 )
[x] Imported: 3062 spp (vs 2919 + 144† in ac19)
[x] Metadata: updated from YAML file 2021-10-11. Version & date were manually changed as Oct 2021 / 2021-10-01.
[x] Classification: Before import (left as in ac19 plus updated SF Cockroach):
After import and new sector established as infraorder Isoptera (all SF Cockroach sectors dropped in NotAssigned infraorder):
ITIS says: [order] Isoptera Brullé, 1832 Taxonomic Status: Current Standing: invalid - other, see Beccaloni & Eggleton (2013) regarding the treatment of termites as a subset of Blattodea. TW says: infraorder Isoptera Brulle, 1832. This name is valid/accepted.