Pterophoroidea (id 1199): test report

yroskov commented 2 years ago

Pterophoroidea was synced on 2021-12-13 in a preparation of December edition.

Checked on PREVIEW website https://preview.catalogueoflife.org 2021-12-14.

Spotted problems (for attention of @dhobern)

[ ] Metadata: no English name for the group. Can Plume Moths be applied as English name for the superfamily?
[ ] Missing references with accepted names (see example below)
[ ] Perhaps, some references are incomplete: missing year (?)

Example: https://preview.catalogueoflife.org/data/taxon/65QCF

Hmm, the year is in place on PROD with previous version. Perhaps, it related to the same problem https://github.com/CatalogueOfLife/backend/issues/1081

yroskov commented 2 years ago

Pterophoroidea 1.1.22.272 (29 Sep 2022) / 2022-09-29; synced 2022-10-20

yroskov commented 1 year ago

Pterophoroidea 1.1.22.334 (30 Nov 2022) / 2022-11-30; imported 2022-11-30

[x] Imported: 1572 spp
[x] Metadata: OK
[x] Classification: OK
[x] Sector: OK

ISSUES @dhobern, you may find this report useful:

[ ] Parent Name Mismatch, 2: species Merrifieldia oligocenicus appears in the genus Pterophorus; species Stenoptilia caroli in the genus Sphenarches: https://www.checklistbank.org/catalogue/3/dataset/1199/workbench?facet=rank&facet=issue&facet=status&facet=nomStatus&facet=nameType&facet=field&facet=authorship&facet=authorshipYear&facet=extinct&facet=environment&facet=origin&issue=parent%20name%20mismatch&limit=100&offset=0

TASKS @dhobern, this case may also need your attention:

[ ] SYN-SYN species (different accepted, same authors), 1: Pterophorus plagiodactylus Stainton, 1851 is a synonym for two different accepted species Stenoptilia bipunctidactyla (Scopoli, 1763) and Stenoptilia plagiodactylus (Stainton, 1851) https://www.checklistbank.org/catalogue/3/dataset/1199/duplicates?acceptedDifferent=true&authorshipDifferent=false&catalogueKey=3&category=binomial&limit=500&minSize=2&mode=STRICT&offset=0&status=synonym

Resolved 2022-12-01:

Synced 2022-12-01

yroskov commented 1 year ago

Pterophoroidea 1.1.23.5 (05 Jan 2023) / 2023-01-05; imported 2023-01-05

[x] Imported: 1574 spp (vs 1572 spp)
[x] Metadata: OK
[x] Classification: OK
[ ] Sector: broken (pointed in the report; not visible in the Assembly tool, but superfamily Pterophoroidea appear outside Lepidoptera in the assembly tree) - NEED TO BE REPAIR before sync

ISSUES assessed 2023-04-10

TASKS

Broken decisions, 12: all deleted

Resolved 2023-04-10

Not Synced yet. Synced

yroskov commented 1 year ago

Pterophoroidea 1.1.23.136 (16 May 2023) / 2023-01-05; imported 2023-05-16

[x] Imported: 1574 spp (vs 1574 spp)
[x] Metadata: @dhobern, version was changed, but release date ("Issued" field in CLB) remains "2023-01-05". Should it be "2023-05-16"?
[x] Classification: OK
[x] Sector: broken; rematched successfully

ISSUES assessed 2023-05-18

[ ] Parent Name Mismatch, 1: species Stenoptilia caroli Arenberger, 1988 is placed in the genus Sphenarches Meyrick, 1886 - for attention of @dhobern:

TASKS

Broken decisions, 12: deleted all

Resolved 2023-05-18:

Synced 2023-05-18

dhobern commented 1 year ago

Thanks @yroskov - I fixed the parenthood for caroli. It should be good now.

yroskov commented 1 year ago

Re-synced 2023-05-19

yroskov commented 1 year ago

Pterophoroidea 1.1.23.148 (28 May 2023) / 2023-01-05; imported 2023-05-28

@dhobern, 2023-05-26: No rush, but there are two new species and some extra distribution records for Kenya in the Pterophoroidea dataset.

[x] Imported: 1580 spp (vs 1574 spp)
[x] Metadata: release date changed 2023-01-05 -> 2023-05-28
[x] Classification: OK
[x] Sector: broken. Rematched.

For attention of @mdoering & @thomasstjerne: Sector reported as broken in CoL - Sectors:

However, shown as healthy in Assembly:

Even, if I clicked in Assembly "sync" it shows a start of the process, but no real progress:

TASKS

Broken decisions, 12: deleted

Resolved 2023-05-31

Synced 2023-05-31

yroskov commented 1 year ago

Re-synced 2023-06-02

yroskov commented 1 year ago

Pterophoroidea ver. 1.1.23.233 (21 Aug 2023) / 2023-01-05; imported 2323-08-29

[x] Imported: 1580 spp (vs 1580 spp)
[x] Metadata: OK
[x] Classification: OK
[x] Sector: OK

TASKS

Broken decisions, 12: deleted all

Resolved 2023-09-06:

Synced 2023-09-06

yroskov commented 1 year ago

Pterophoroidea ver. 1.1.23.284 (11 Oct 2023) / 2023-01-05; imported 2323-10-11

[x] Imported: 1581 spp (vs 1580 spp)
[x] Metadata: OK
[x] Classification: OK
[x] Sector: OK

ISSUES assessed 2023-10-13:

TASKS

Broken decisions, 12: deleted

Synced 2023-10-13

yroskov commented 11 months ago

Pterophoroidea ver. 1.1.23.284 (11 Oct 2023) / 2023-01-05; imported 2323-10-11 = There is no update since CoL of Oct 2023. No need to re-sync.

yroskov commented 9 months ago

Pterophoroidea ver. 1.1.24.6 (06 Jan 2024) / 2023-01-05; imported 2024-01-06

[x] Imported: 1581 spp (vs 1581 spp)
[x] Metadata: OK
[x] Classification: OK
[ ] Sector: OK

TASKS

Broken decisions, 12: deleted
Outdated decisions, 2: deleted

Synced 2024-01-17

yroskov commented 9 months ago

For attention of @thomasstjerne

Strange behavior of "Outdated Decisions" tool:

Outdated Decisions for Pterophoroidea reported 2 names (Pterophorus plagiodactylus): https://www.checklistbank.org/catalogue/3/decision?offset=0&stale=true&subjectDatasetKey=1199

However, both names are included in duplicates report (they are synonyms of two species with different authostrings) and should have decision "Ambiguous Synonym": https://www.checklistbank.org/dataset/1199/names?facet=rank&facet=issue&facet=status&facet=nomStatus&facet=nameType&facet=field&facet=authorship&facet=authorshipYear&facet=extinct&facet=environment&facet=origin&limit=50&offset=0&q=Pterophorus%20plagiodactylus&sortBy=taxonomic

yroskov commented 5 months ago

Pterophoroidea ver. 1.1.24.118 (27 Apr 2024) / 2024-04-27; imported 2024-04-27

[x] Imported: 1585 spp (vs 1581 spp)
[x] Metadata: OK
[x] Classification: OK
[ ] Sector: OK

Metrics:

TASKS

Broken decisions, 12 = deleted
Outdated decisions, 2 = deleted

Resolved 2024-05-14:

Synced 2024-05-14

dhobern commented 3 months ago

@yroskov Eight distribution records added for Mali

dhobern commented 3 months ago

@yroskov Five new species

yroskov commented 3 months ago

Pterophoroidea ver. 1.1.24.199 (17 Jul 2024) / 2024-07-17; imported 2024-07-17

[x] Imported: 1590 spp (vs 1585 spp)
[x] Metadata: OK
[x] Classification: OK
[ ] Sector: OK

Metrics:

TASKS

Broken decisions, 12 = deleted
Outdated decisions, 2 = no action

Resolved 2024-07-18:

Synced 2024-07-18

dhobern commented 2 months ago

@yroskov Four new species, five new combinations, one mistaken duplicate removed, many new distribution records

yroskov commented 2 months ago

Pterophoroidea ver. 1.1.24.215 (02 Aug 2024) / 2024-08-02; imported 2024-08-02

[x] Imported: 1593 spp (vs 1590 spp)
[x] Metadata: OK
[x] Classification: OK
[x] Sector: OK
[x] Extinct flag: OK (1 sp)
[ ] DOI: incorrect - refers back to August 17, 2021 on GBIF page: Hobern, D., & Gielis, C. (2024). Catalogue of the Pterophoroidea of the World (D. Hobern, Ed.; 1.1.24.215 (02 Aug 2024)). The Catalogue of Life Partnership. https://doi.org/10.15468/d9u533

Metrics:

ISSUES assessed 2024-08-19

@dhobern, you might be interested: Id Not Unique, 2 https://www.checklistbank.org/dataset/1199/verbatim?issue=id%20not%20unique

TASKS

Broken decisions, 12 = deleted
Outdated decisions, 2 = no actions

Resolved 2024-08-19 (Something strange happened with CLB today. Application of decisions is extremely slow. For example, it took about 4 mins for 2 names: https://www.checklistbank.org/catalogue/3/dataset/1199/duplicates?acceptedDifferent=tru[…]ial&limit=50&minSize=2&mode=STRICT&offset=0&status=synonym - reported in Slack):

Synced 2024-08-19

CatalogueOfLife / testing

Pterophoroidea (id 1199): test report #179