Gelechiidae (id 2362): test report

[yroskov]

New GSD for June 2022 release

• [x] Metadata in CLB (2022-05-27)

Short Name: Gelechiidae Full Name: Catalogue of the Gelechiidae of the World Version / Issued: 1.1.22.126 (06 May 2022) / 2022-05-06 Abstract: This GSD is derived from the Gelechiidae list maintained by Klaus Sattler (NHM UK). The database has been edited for inclusion as a structured dataset in the Catalogue of Life by Donald Hobern. Creator: Hobern, Donald; Sattler, Klaus Editor: Hobern, Donald Taxonomic scope: Gelechiidae English name of the taxon: Gelechiid moths (as in ITIS; = PATCHED); Twirler moths or gelechiid moths (as in Wikipedia) Geographic scope: global Temporal scope: All taxa described to present Checklist Confidence: 5 Completeness: 99%

• [ ] No logo

[yroskov]

• [x] Imported: 5,638 spp

[yroskov]

• [x] Classification: ranks-in-use [kingdom-phylum-class-order-superfamily]-family-subfamily-genus-tribe (in subfamily Gelechiinae only)-species

Set of genera (some with status ProvAcc) and species (all with status ProvAcc) are in the root of the family tree. Few genera in the root of tree are empty (no spp), for example, Cochlevalva, Distinxia, Empista

• [ ] Family, subfamilies & tribes have no authorstrings.

• [x] Sector: established as family Gelechiidae 2022-05-26

[yroskov]

ISSUES assessed 2022-05-27

• Unusual Name Characters, 3: two synonyms with genus name in single quotation marks, 'Gelechia' dammersi Keifer, 1936; 'Gelechia' eldorada Keifer, 1936

@dhobern, some names need attention and corrections outside CLB:

• Wrong Monomial Case, 5: looks like the subgenus isn't recognized by CLB correctly: Scrobipalpula (psilella) Povolný, 1964; Scrobipalpula (psilella) japonica Povolný, 2000; Scrobipalpula (psilella) seniorum Povolný, 2000
  https://www.checklistbank.org/catalogue/3/dataset/2362/workbench?facet=rank&facet=issue&facet=status&facet=nomStatus&facet=nameType&facet=field&facet=authorship&facet=authorshipYear&facet=extinct&facet=environment&facet=origin&issue=wrong%20monomial%20case&limit=100&offset=0

• Uppercase Epithet, 5: is it misinterpretation of names with sugnenus Tinea? (5 synonyms, e.g. Phalaena tinea interuptella Hübner, 1793 (interpreted as subspecies) ) https://www.checklistbank.org/catalogue/3/dataset/2362/workbench?facet=rank&facet=issue&facet=status&facet=nomStatus&facet=nameType&facet=field&facet=authorship&facet=authorshipYear&facet=extinct&facet=environment&facet=origin&issue=uppercase%20epithet&limit=100&offset=0

[yroskov]

Other issues:

• Square brackets, quotation marks, question mark in the name, authorstring: Examples: 'Gelechia' dammersi Keifer, 1936 ? senecionella Bruand, 1859 Bryotropha terrella ( [Denis & Schiffermüller] , 1775) Acompsia Hübner, [1825]

[yroskov]

TASKS

Resolved 2022-05-27:

_ACC-ACC_sppsameAuth remains unresolved (need input from Donald).

[yroskov]

Synced 2022-05-27

[dhobern]

The 'Gelechia' in single quotes represented uncertainty in the genus at the time the species as described. I've simply removed these because that seems best to reflect the intention (and we are not asserting anything on classification from synonyms).

The (psilella) ones were apparently intended as representations of a species group (not a formal subgenus). I've fixed these by simply losing the (psilella) and fixing the rank to genus.

The Phalaena Tinea stuff is some cases I missed. Linnaeus placed all Lepidoptera in six massive genera (including Phalaena) and then subdivided these with (still massive) named groups like Tinea - the way to map this against Linnaean ranks is unclear and different platforms do it differently, but the ICZN made some decisions which effectively treat the subdivisions as the actual genera. I have removed the Phalaena part for these names and fixed the ranks back to species.

The question marks are for a case where the original description is unclear on the intended genus. I have fixed this by treating it as the same genus as the earlier basionym to which it is now synonymised.

The square brackets in authorship are the standard practice throughout lepidopterology for some of the messier 18th/19th century publications. I'd like to leave those in place.

[dhobern]

I've uploaded a new version of the Gelechiidae dataset that fixes the issues on its side:

• Removed quotation marks from around 'Gelechia'
• Removed Linnaeus' Phalaena from Phalaena Tinea
• Removed Povolný's psilella species group references
• Fixed various question marks
• Fixed five cases where the same name/taxon was repeated within the dataset

The square brackets in authorship are normal practice in Lepidoptera nomenclature to address issues with some really messy publications. These should be retained.

I have also made changes to LepIndex within TaxonWorks to move five species from other families into the Gelechiidae when the Gelechiidae dataset now includes these.

These two sets of changes should resolve all the ACC-ACC_spp_sameAuth cases, but I have not yet reimported the TaxonWorks LepIndex into CLB. I'll look first at some of the other reported issues in that dataset.

[yroskov]

Thank you, @dhobern ! I can see that you have imported a new version: Gelechiidae, ver. 1.1.22.148 (28 May 2022). We can go ahead with it (data synced now).

• [x] Imported: 5,632 spp (vs 5,638 spp, 06 May 2022)
• [x] Sector: OK

TASKS 2022-05-31

• [x] Broken decisions: 3; = deleted all.

Resolved 2022-05-31

Synced 2022-05-31

[yroskov]

@dhobern, 2022-06-06:

I've now processed around 30 papers on Gelechiidae from Zootaxa and one from Systematic Entomology, all from the period 2018-2022. I think this should cover the most significant additions since Klaus retired. It would therefore be great if you can reprocess the Gelechiidae as well as LepIndex.

Version 1.1.22.159 (08 Jun 2022) / 2022-06-08

• [x] Imported: 5,778 spp (vs 5,632 spp, 28 May 2022)
• [x] Metadata: OK
• [x] Sector: OK

TASKS as 2022-06-08

For attention of @dhobern

• ACC-ACC spp, same author: two pairs of identical accepted names: ids 4722 & 11322 (blocked) Dichomeris tananaella (Viette, 1985) ids 11316 (blocked) & 10175 Sophronia salaganella Šumpich & Bidzilya, 2019
  = NAME WITH HIGHER ID BLOCKED IN EACH PAIR FOR NOW

Resolved:

Synced 2022-06-08

[yroskov]

Gelechiidae 1.1.22.293 (20 Oct 2022) / 2022-10-20; synced 2022-10-20

[yroskov]

New version ready. Donald, 2022-11-28: The Gelechiidae are "just" distribution and hostplant records.

Version 1.1.22.332 (28 Nov 2022) / 2022-11-28; imported 2022-11-28

• [x] Imported: 5,789 spp (vs 5,778 spp of 08 Jun 2022)
• [x] Metadata: OK
• [x] Sector: OK

Synced 2022-11-28

[yroskov]

ISSUES

• [ ] Parent Name Mismatch, 1: species Scrobipalpulopsis stirodes appears as a child of the genus Scrobipalpula. https://www.checklistbank.org/catalogue/3/dataset/2362/workbench?facet=rank&facet=issue&facet=status&facet=nomStatus&facet=nameType&facet=field&facet=authorship&facet=authorshipYear&facet=extinct&facet=environment&facet=origin&issue=parent%20name%20mismatch&limit=100&offset=0)

• [ ] Character encoding problems in some references (rare, not in the reports). Example: https://preview.catalogueoflife.org/data/taxon/92MLR

[yroskov]

TASKS

• Broken decision, 1: deleted.
• Identical subgenus, 1: subgenus Kiwaia (Empista) Povolný, 1968 and Kiwaia (Empista) Philpott, 1930 are both present as accepted: https://www.checklistbank.org/catalogue/3/dataset/2362/duplicates?catalogueKey=3&category=uninomial&limit=500&minSize=2&mode=STRICT&offset=0&rank=subgenus&status=accepted&withDecision=false

Resolved 2022-11-30:

Re-synced 2022-11-30

[dhobern]

Thanks - I've dealt with these and re-uploaded the data.

[yroskov]

New version ready. @dhobern, 2022-04-07: The Gelechiidae have been updated with six species I missed from 2020.

Version 1.1.23.97 (07 Apr 2023); imported 2023-04-07

• [x] Imported: 5,808 spp (vs 5,789 spp in 1.1.22.332 (28 Nov 2022))
• [x] Metadata: OK
• [x] Sector: OK
• [x] Classification: OK Empty genera (4 genera outside subfamilies): Anoecisis Walsingham, 1904; Distinxia Povolný, 1967; Empista Povolný, 1968; Gelechiodeorum Kusnetzov, 1941.

ISSUES assessed 2023-04-10

TASKS

Synced 2023-04-10

[yroskov]

@dhobern, 2022-04-20: I have the provisional status in my other datasets but forgot to set it for these. They should be good now. So you can reimport Gelechiidae whenever suits you.

Version 1.1.23.111 (21 Apr 2023); imported 2023-04-21

• [x] Imported: 5,809 spp (vs 5,808 spp in 1.1.23.97)
• [x] Metadata: OK
• [x] Sector: OK
• [x] Classification: OK

TASKS unchanged

Synced 2023-04-21

[yroskov]

Version 1.1.23.140 (20 May 2023); imported 2023-05-20

@dhobern, 2023-05-19: Seven new species in the Gelechiidae dataset and I've cleaned up the remaining red issues.

• [x] Imported: 5,816 spp (vs 5,809 spp in 1.1.23.111)
• [x] Metadata: OK
• [x] Sector: OK
• [x] Classification: OK

TASKS (no actions needed)

• Broken decisions, 2: deleted

Synced 2023-05-22

[yroskov]

Version 1.1.23.152 (01 Jun 2023) / 2023-04-27; imported 2023-06-01

@dhobern, 2023-06-01: Several new papers processed for Gelechiidae and around 100 more species in GLI.

• [x] Imported: 5,823 spp (vs 5,816 spp )
• [x] Metadata: incorrect release date as "2023-04-27" (version of 01 Jun 2023 imported 2023-06-01) = 1.1.23.153 (02 Jun 2023) / 2023-06-02 = FIXED 2023-06-02
• [x] Sector: broken
• [x] Classification: OK

TASKS = no actions

Not synced (awaiting correction in metadata).

Synced 2023-06-02

[yroskov]

Gelechiidae 1.1.23.196 (15 Jul 2023) / 2023-07-15; imported 2023-07-15

• [x] Imported: 5,826 spp (vs 5,823 spp )
• [x] Metadata: OK
• [x] Classification: OK (selected genera & all spp in the Tree root already have "prov." status)
• [x] Sector: broken

ISSUES assessed 2023-07-17

TASKS = no actions

Synced 2023-07-17

[yroskov]

Gelechiidae 1.1.23.216 (04 Aug 2023) / 2023-08-04; imported 2023-08-04

• [x] Imported: 5,827 spp (vs 5,826 spp )
• [x] Metadata: OK
• [x] Classification: OK (selected genera & all spp in the Tree root already have "prov." status)
• [x] Sector: OK

TASKS no issues

Synced 2023-08-11

[yroskov]

Gelechiidae ver 1.1.23.244 (01 Sep 2023) / 2023-09-01; imported 2023-09-01

• [x] Imported: 5,828 spp (vs 5,827 spp )
• [x] Metadata: OK
• [x] Classification: OK (as above)
• [x] Sector: OK

ISSUES assessed 2023-10-13:

TASKS = no issues

Synced 2023-09-06 re-synced 2023-09-12

[yroskov]

Gelechiidae ver 1.1.23.244 (01 Sep 2023) / 2023-09-01; imported 2023-10-12

• [x] Imported: 5,844 spp (vs 5,828 spp )
• [x] Metadata: OK
• [x] Classification: OK (as above)
• [x] Sector: OK

TASKS = no issues

Synced 2023-10-13

[yroskov]

Gelechiidae ver 1.1.23.315 (11 Nov 2023) / 2023-11-11; imported 2023-11-11

• [x] Imported: 5847 spp (vs 5844 spp )
• [x] Metadata: OK
• [x] Classification: OK (as above)
• [x] Sector: OK

TASKS = no issues

Synced 2023-11-13

[yroskov]

Gelechiidae ver 1.1.24.23 (23 Jan 2024) / 2024-01-23; imported 2024-01-23

• [x] Imported: 5845 spp (vs 5847 spp )
• [x] Metadata: OK
• [x] Classification: OK (as above)
• [x] Sector: OK

ISSUES assessed 2024-02-02

• Infrageneric Field Misplaced, 2: two subgenera in the same genus, different styles of presentation (one as mononomial, another as combination):

TASKS no issues

Synced 2024-02-02

[dhobern]

@yroskov Updated with four more species

[yroskov]

Gelechiidae ver 1.1.24.53 (22 Feb 2024) / 2024-02-22; imported 2024-02-22

• [x] Imported: 5849 spp (vs 5845 spp)

Synced 2024-02-22

[yroskov]

Gelechiidae ver 1.1.24.73 (13 Mar 2024) / 2024-03-13; imported 2024-03-13

• [x] Imported: 5849 spp (vs 5849 spp )
• [x] Metadata: OK
• [x] Classification: OK
• [x] Sector: OK

Metrics:

TASKS

Synced 2024-03-18

[yroskov]

Gelechiidae ver 1.1.24.104 (13 Apr 2024) / 2024-04-13; imported 2024-04-13

• [x] Imported: 5850 spp (vs 5849 spp )
• [x] Metadata: OK
• [x] Classification: OK
• [x] Sector: OK
• [x] Extinct flag: n/a
• [ ] No DOI

Metrics:

ISSUES assessed 2024-04-18

TASKS no issues

Synced 2024-04-18

[yroskov]

Gelechiidae ver 1.1.24.130 (09 May 2024) / 2024-05-09; imported 2024-05-09

• [x] Imported: 5854 spp (vs 5850 spp )
• [x] Metadata: OK
• [x] Classification: OK
• [x] Sector: OK
• [x] Extinct flag: n/a
• [ ] No DOI

Metrics:

ISSUES assessed 2024-05-14

TASKS = no new issues

Synced 2024-05-14

[dhobern]

@yroskov - 84 new species today (and one synonymy and five restored combinations)

[yroskov]

OK, thanks! I will re-sync Gelechiidae for May edition as soon as I get green light to resume my work from Markus

[yroskov]

Gelechiidae ver 1.1.24.136 (15 May 2024) / 2024-05-15; imported 2024-05-15

• [x] Imported: 5937 spp (vs 5854 spp )
• [x] Metadata: OK
• [x] Classification: OK
• [x] Sector: OK
• [x] Extinct flag: n/a
• [ ] No DOI

TASKS = no changes

[dhobern]

The most recent shows as no changes because I accidentally imported it twice tonight. The previous import shows the change.

[yroskov]

It's only "no changes" in Tasks (not Diff tool), i.e. no new unresolved duplicated names. New sync will be done anyway.

Synced 2024-05-15

[dhobern]

@yroskov 10 new species

[yroskov]

Gelechiidae ver 1.1.24.227 (14 Aug 2024) / 2024-08-14; imported 2024-08-14

• [x] Imported: 5947 spp (vs 5937 spp )
• [x] Metadata: OK
• [x] Classification: OK
• [x] Sector: OK
• [x] Extinct flag: n/a
• [ ] No DOI

Metrics:

ISSUES assessed 2024-08-19

• [ ] Parent Name Mismatch, 5: five species with binomial combinations in genus Thiotricha are placed under Polyhymno genus in the classification. - for attention of @dhobern https://www.checklistbank.org/dataset/2362/classification?taxonKey=8615 = For now, I flagged tried to flag all 5 as "provisionally accepted" Bug (@thomasstjerne or @mdoering) - decisions are not displayed in the interface (or not applies?):

@dhobern, you might be also interested to look through the reports Unlikely Year, 19 - a letter present in the year; Related Name Missing, 1688

TASKS = no new issues

Synced 2024-08-19

[dhobern]

@yroskov New combinations and synonymy

[yroskov]

**Gelechiidae ver 1.1.24.260 (16 Sep 2024) / 2024-09-16; imported 2024-09-16

• [x] Imported: 5943 spp (vs 5937 spp )
• [x] Metadata: OK
• [x] Classification: OK
• [x] Sector: OK
• [x] Extinct flag: n/a
• [ ] No DOI

Metrics:

ISSUES assessed 2024-09-18

• [ ] Infrageneric Field Misplaced 2 - _@dhobern, there two different presentations of subgenus here. I think, CLB expected subgenus shown as uninomial in CLB. i.e. Mimomeris Povolný, 1978 (corrected via complex decision in CoL)

TASKS = no new issues

Synced 2024-09-18

[yroskov]

**Gelechiidae ver. 1.1.24.291 (17 Oct 2024) / 2024-10-17; imported 2024-10-17

• [x] Imported: 5944 spp (vs 5943 spp )
• [x] Metadata: OK; Field Citation: Hobern, D., & Sattler, K. (2024). Catalogue of World Gelechiidae (D. Hobern & S. Lee, Eds.; 1.1.24.291 (17 Oct 2024)).
• [x] Classification: OK. Subfamilies have no authorstrings. There are 3 empty genera out of subfamilies: Anoecisis Walsingham, 1904; Cochlevalva M.M. Omelko, 1986; Gelechiodeorum Kusnetzov, 1941
• [x] Sector: OK
• [x] Extinct flag: n/a
• [ ] No DOI

Metrics:

TASKS = no new issues

Synced 2024-10-22

[yroskov]

@dhobern, I am forwarding this comment from Stephen to you:

Stephen Garnett, wrote 2024-11-18:

Gelechidae links to no website but this one seems to be the list gelechiidae.github.io/species/

If you would like to include the link in Gelechiidae metadata, please, do.

[dhobern]

Really interesting - I'll follow up with Sangmi and Richard to see what their plans are. This is not directly connected to the Gelechiidae dataset (which is now newer than theirs in at least some respects). It looks like it is hosted in TW, which is excellent. More soon.