Open yroskov opened 1 year ago
ISSUES assessed 2023-03-06
TASKS
@dhobern, editors of the checklist might be interested to look on following duplicated names:
[ ] Duplicated accepted species (https://www.checklistbank.org/catalogue/3/dataset/219318/duplicates?authorshipDifferent=true&catalogueKey=3&category=binomial&limit=500&minSize=2&mode=STRICT&offset=0&status=accepted) Choristoneura irina Dubatolov & Syachina, 2007 vs Choristoneura irina Syachina & Budashkin, 2007 (both flagged as "provisionally accepted" in the CoL) Clepsis neomelissa (Rose & Pooni, 2004) - flagged as "provisionally accepted" in the CoL for now vs Clepsis neomelissa Rose & Pooni, 2004 Phaecasiophora similithaiensis Yu & Li, 2006 vs Phaecasiophora similithaiensis (Yu & Li, 2006) - flagged as "provisionally accepted" in the CoL for now Phaecasiophora supparallelica Yu & Li, missing year vs Phaecasiophora supparallelica Yu & Li, 2006
[ ] Duplicated accepted species with identical authorstrings, 28 pairs: https://www.checklistbank.org/catalogue/3/dataset/219318/duplicates?authorshipDifferent=false&catalogueKey=3&category=binomial&limit=500&minSize=2&mode=STRICT&offset=0&status=accepted @dhobern, I guess, records in each pair should be merged before import in the CLB. The only difference between records which I can spot so far is a depository of the type specimen.
[ ] Identical synonyms with identical authorstrings attached to different accepted species, 4 pairs: https://www.checklistbank.org/catalogue/3/dataset/219318/duplicates?acceptedDifferent=true&authorshipDifferent=false&catalogueKey=3&category=binomial&limit=500&minSize=2&mode=STRICT&offset=0&status=synonym It may have a reason or might be historical bugs in the checklist.
Resolved 2023-03-06:
Synced 2023-03-06
Thanks - I'll fix these today
I'll remove T@RTS from the metadata - that's really historical information
I'll remove T@RTS from the metadata - that's really historical information
T@RTS is mentioned in the abstract only. If that name is well known to the experts, perhaps, it will be helpful just to mention that Tortricid.net is a new name for T@RTS (please add "year-year", as a period of product/project existence).
@dhobern, 2023-05-19: I've also included some fixes identified by the authors of the Tortricidae dataset and fixed processing for some of the more complex original combinations. It doesn't really change the species count, but it does mean several hundred more names.
Tortricid.net, ver. 4.0 / 2018-12-31 (unchanged version)
TASKS
Resolved 2023-05-19:
Re-synced 2023-05-19
Checks of PREVIEW 2023-05-31:
Tortricid.net: extant spp number dropped from 11327 to 11266 (-61), why?
2023-05-31:
TASKS
Resolved 2023-05-31:
Synced 2023-05-31
@dhobern, 2023-07-21: Not sure what the reason is, but the July release has attached Tortricidae to Insecta rather than Lepidoptera > Tortricidae. It was correct in the annual release. @mdoering, 2023-07-21: the sector target is broken. I assume it is again some id change we've seen before that causes problems?
Tortricid.net (imported 2023-06-15), synced 2023-05-31. GLI synced 2023-07-17.
Does it mean that Tortricidae ID was changed in GLI? @dhobern, what may cause this change (content edits (for example, added authorship), TW management of IDs or unsustainable export)?
Anyway, management of nested sectors in CLB projects is unsustainable.
The true cause of the bug: I have blocked superfamily Tortricoidea in GLI, but did not adjusted Tortricid.net sector (it remain as a family Tortricidae). As a result, family Tortricidae was attached to class Insecta.
Tortricid.net ver. 4.0 / 2018-12-31; imported 2023-06-15
TASKS
Resolved 2023-07-21:
Synced 2023-07-21
@dhobern, could you please define Nomenclatural Code on this CLB page:
I have already added it and triggered a reimport.
It would help in the future to leave URLs to the respective pages rather than screenshots which are not "actionable"
Screenshot is documented evidence.
https://www.checklistbank.org/dataset/219318/about
It's not clear why there are two nick names for the resource: Tortricid.net and T@RTS - ask @dhobern for clarification
Contact: Gilligan, Todd, USDA APHIS, Plant Protection and Quarantine, Science and TechnologyFort Collins, CO, US Publisher: No information Creator: No information Editors: Gilligan, Todd USDA APHIS Plant Protection and Quarantine, Science and TechnologyFort Collins, CO, US Brown, John National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution Department of EntomologyWashington, DC, US Baixeras, Joaquín Universitat de València Department of ZoologyPaterna, València Contributors: Brown, Richard; Horak, Marianne; Komai, Furumi; Metzler, Eric; Razowski, Józef; Tuck, Kevin English name of the group: Leafroller moths Geographic scope: World Temporal scope: Recent and fossil Origin: external Type: taxonomic License: cc by Checklist Confidence: 5 Completeness: 95% Url (website): http://tortricidae.com
Logo:![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/28574252/223179547-d0797c8e-947a-465d-883f-9ec4bc162292.png)