Open yroskov opened 6 months ago
What should be regarded as correct presentation, "as combinations" or "as uninomials"? How CoL/CLB can manage subgenera?
Presentation in the interface, in the Tree:
It unfortunately depends on the code and available data. If an infra generic name is given with the genus it should be shown together. If not, an uninominal is all we have:
https://github.com/CatalogueOfLife/coldp/blob/master/docs/publishing-guide.md#infrageneric-names
For the assembled COL checklist I agree we should standardise the representation as much as we can.
I would argue for a simple uninomial
like Abacantha and keep the subgenus in the bi/trinomial only in brackets - at least for zoological names.
@gdower, would it be possible to unify presentation of subgenera in CoLDP from different source chjecklists?
Subgenera now appear as uninomials in Systema Dipterorum & ITIS (e.g. Abacantha, Abapa, etc.):
Systema Dipterorum: https://www.checklistbank.org/dataset/1101/names?facet=rank&facet=issue&facet=status&facet=nomStatus&facet=nameType&facet=field&facet=authorship&facet=authorshipYear&facet=extinct&facet=environment&facet=origin&limit=50&offset=0&rank=subgenus&sortBy=taxonomic
ITIS: https://www.checklistbank.org/dataset/2144/names?facet=rank&facet=issue&facet=status&facet=nomStatus&facet=nameType&facet=field&facet=authorship&facet=authorshipYear&facet=extinct&facet=environment&facet=origin&limit=50&offset=0&rank=subgenus&reverse=false&sortBy=taxonomic
and
Subgenera appear as combinations in TaxonWorks & WoRMS exports (e.g. Abrodiaeta (Abrodiaeta), Acauloplacella (Acauloplacella), etc.)
SF Orthoptera: https://www.checklistbank.org/dataset/1021/names?facet=rank&facet=issue&facet=status&facet=nomStatus&facet=nameType&facet=field&facet=authorship&facet=authorshipYear&facet=extinct&facet=environment&facet=origin&limit=50&offset=0&rank=subgenus&sortBy=taxonomic
3i Auchenorrhyncha: https://www.checklistbank.org/dataset/2317/names?facet=rank&facet=issue&facet=status&facet=nomStatus&facet=nameType&facet=field&facet=authorship&facet=authorshipYear&facet=extinct&facet=environment&facet=origin&limit=50&offset=0&rank=subgenus&sortBy=taxonomic
WCO (Opiliones): https://www.checklistbank.org/dataset/2256/names?facet=rank&facet=issue&facet=status&facet=nomStatus&facet=nameType&facet=field&facet=authorship&facet=authorshipYear&facet=extinct&facet=environment&facet=origin&limit=50&offset=0&rank=subgenus&sortBy=taxonomic
WoRMS Mollusca: https://www.checklistbank.org/dataset/1130/names?facet=rank&facet=issue&facet=status&facet=nomStatus&facet=nameType&facet=field&facet=authorship&facet=authorshipYear&facet=extinct&facet=environment&facet=origin&limit=50&offset=0&rank=subgenus&sortBy=taxonomic
Just in case, checklists under Botanical Code: Bryonames & World Plants/Ferns have subgenera in synonyms only. WCVP, WWW & Species Fungorum Plus have no subgenera at all.