Open harriswarren opened 2 years ago
I believe that Catalyst Technical Counsil decisions should be ratified with on-chain vote; not initially as I understand there is a transition period and certain requirement for agility at this point.
This could be acomplished by the Catalyst Technical Counsil making proposals for parameters of sprint (fund period) N + 1, which would be voted on in fund N voting window.
Also, please let me add reference to the complete slide-deck and Method for Selecting Catalyst Technical Council proposal.
IOG has presented the concept of the Catalyst Circle to be engaged in co-defining 'Catalyst Parameters'. It is ideal that the Circle starts with a few Catalyst Parameters and work through a process to present a proposal and decide/vote on the Parameter Change within Circle Meetings. The parameters can be identified based on community sensing or future fund planning.