stephen-rowan
commented
2 years ago Future of Swarm: Reputation Systems
- Possible PRISM integration and giving tokens to people who join meets
Introductions :
- In early Bitcoin had have interactive verification of reputation to purchase
- Verification of reputation
- ID is one issue - DIDs is trying to solve - aim to prove how you are - reputation is a whole different subject - Filip
- DID does not address whether should I be trusted or not - more philosophical than technical problem - Filip
- reputation is totally different from credentials - Quasar
- At the end of the Plutus program you got a certificate - having certain reputation - Jakob
- First cohort of Plutus pioneers required owners to mint NFT - so a mixture of credentials and reputation - Stephen
- Certain kinds of reputation associated with some forms of ID (e.g. Harvard) etc. Ken
- Reputation can pass from the issuer of the ID to the receipt - Jakob
- Security issues - system can create profiles of ID issue - so the issue is how to verify reputation without profiling - Vincent
- reputation by authority vs reputation by peers - Tyler
- Different languages, experiences - trust is cultural - the same social credit others have - this is what I mean by context - Marta
- Do we need taxonomies - reputation is give not taken - Nori
- Build up a foundation of things we need - for reputation and ID - Nori
- sounds like zero knowledge proof - Tyler
- If we think reputation as set of predicates - is person qualified etc - then others can only search predicates - Vincent
- Nevertheless sets of predicates can provide ID inferences ? - Stephen
- Also Ricardian contracts (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ricardian_contract ) - Stephen
- Subscribe to sets of predicate logics - Vincent
- Question for Vincent - privatizing data - Government does scan of what people are doing - how do you handle refusal of data provision - Benjamin
- Decentralized storage mechanism - IPFS - Vincent
- You could decide where to store your personal data based on privacy and availability tradeoffs - Nori
- Be careful to keep out exploitation and bad actors - Marta
- Clarify difference between credentials and reputation - how these things can be easily accessed - Nori
- Building secure reputation systems is tricky - - People ascribe sub credits onto a credential - Vincent
- We also need to be mindful of different legislation around the world that can impact implementation or requirements, ex: https://gdpr-info.eu/chapter-3/ - Nori
- Reputation is a way of looking at trust - web of trust - build a set of trust - transitive - Adam
- How do you recognize non-credential reputation - how do you judge reputation of a good artist - Plamen
- Reputation and trust has a nested structure - credentials spread out through the web of trust - Zero knowledge proof- Tyler
- Linked-in has a form of “I trust x to do y” that forms a kind of reputation system - Nori
- Avatars in games associated with different skills - Kerstin
- Credentials always third parties involved - reputations are subjective - Juan
- No reason we can have it all - engineering solution - Vincent
- We could build system - for example male programmers - subsets of reputation - has to be some opening or grey area - Marta
- Some random solution or wildcard - Stephen
- I believe that "know how" is always more relevant that sex, age, etc. the boundaries are fading out now a days. - Juan
- The idea of randomize is good if you are trying to get out of set situation s- from predicates to permissions - Ken
- Give permission only check certain type of reputation - how can people see negative credentials - reputation - Adam
- Transparency of the interrogation of reputation - Juan
- If you give someone provenance over data - assume they will not self-assign negative reputation - Vincent
- Weighting search results - track with a person with the rest of their life - Marta
- Not strictly about moment - claims being made - all parties have access to that claim - burnable systems - Quasar
- Set of keys - more wallets with positive transactions - Quasar
- The identity only exists at the moment it is needed - mint as "access nft" burn after access is granted - Tyler
- Data dignity - Marta
- and the sovereignty part of this is about the data not the identity - not only Atala Prism there are other solutions - Quasar
- Authority grants NFTs - reflect on process - stack overflow - reputation of 10k - means nothing - we should visualize reputation - have dome something -Benjamin
- Having a history of reputation - blockchain is great for that - if that is destroyed what are you left with ? - parallel trace of immutability - Marta
- You need another blockchain - to check on the other - how the system can gamed - it is difficult to self promote - Vincent
References
Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs) v1.0 - Core architecture, data model, and representations
- https://www.w3.org/TR/did-core/ -
- https://github.com/w3c-ccg
- https://www.w3.org/community/
atala-prism
- https://www.atixlabs.com/atala-prism
- https://www.atixlabs.com/didi
F6: Atala PRISM DID Mass-Scale Adoption - Challenge -
- https://cardano.ideascale.com/a/campaign-home/26116
Interplanetary File System
- Interplanetary File System - https://ipfs.io/
Danielle_Citron
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danielle_Citron
- https://www.daniellecitron.com/
-
- Law's Expressive Value in Combating Cyber Gender Harassment - https://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1300&context=mlr
QuasarChains
DanM3rcurius
Saturday-Swarm-Session - 11th September 2021
Breakout Sessions
Moderator Checklist for sessions
Host Checklist for sessions