VanCardui
commented
2 weeks ago Current situation
- Some active Intersect members who engage in working groups etc, don't attend TH or ATH
- Some people are members, but are not active at all.
- The Intersect Team is in the process of creating a list of members
How we want the current situation to change:
- People who are active e.g. in working groups and on Discord and/or Twitter will get involved in Town Hall
- Intersect members who are not involved at all will feel welcome and will join TH and ATH
Who are the stakeholders?
-
Any previous attempts to address this problem?
Questions and possible approaches:
- Should we expect to see people at TH and ATH who are not yet involved at all?
- Should we expect to be able to involve people who are active in WGs?
- Are there any issues with contacting people and asking them to get involved?
- How should we contact them?
- Can we ping specific workgroups in Discord? How are Discord roles used?
- Do we need clarity in TH and ATH on whose voices are Intersect Team members, and whose are "the community"?
Ideas:
- Intersect members list, when done, could be made accessible to the Town Hall Workgroup for sending surveys and for inviting to 1 to 1 calls?
- Most Discord roles are related to specific permissions and overall permissions; some roles are related to partner networks. Roles are meant to be general. To keep it simple, best not to introduce WG roles due to the large amount of them.
- Follow up on List Creation and provide a filter option: "Intersect Team members" and "community"?
Measure:
- numbers attending TH
- numbers attending ATH
- numbers facilitating an ATH
- numbers of people attending for the first time
- number of attendees who are not involved elsewhere in Intersect
Source:
Town Hall #1, Thurs 6th June 2024
Problem
We don't know how to reach those who are Intersect members but not very involved at all; and those who are active, but don't come to TH