michaelweylandt
commented
3 days ago Thanks @Cdiallo77 !
Peer Feedback:
- @Harry-2099
- @aaronkcooper
- @jasonamey
- @bleuuuz
It is now time for the peer feedback round for Mini-Project 03. Please review @Cdiallo77's submission for this mini-project and provide peer feedback.
Using the rubric at https://michael-weylandt.com/STA9750/miniprojects/mini03.html#rubric, please grade their submission out of a total of 50 points. Note that this rubric is slightly different than that used for Mini-Projects 01 and 02.
For each of the five categories, please give them a separate score and provide a total (sum) score across the entire assignment. Feel free to assign extra credit if you feel it is warranted (following the rubric).
If you give a score of less than 5 for any category, please provide a suggestion for improvement. (You can also give suggestions for any element they did well - more feedback is always great!)
As you go through this peer feedback exercise, think about what you particularly like about this submission and how you can incorporate that approach in your future work. If something is particularly insightful or creative, give some kudos!
Evaluators: This should take you around 15 minutes per peer feedback. You are not required to engage in substantial back-and-forth with @Cdiallo77, but you are of course welcome to initiate a discussion.
@Cdiallo77: please engage fully with your peers. They are here to help you!
Submission URL should be: https://Cdiallo77.github.io/STA9750-2024-FALL/mp03.html
Feel free to link to other repos, the course documentation, or other useful examples.
Thanks! @michaelweylandt
CC: @charles-ramirez
Hi @michaelweylandt!
I've uploaded my work for MiniProject https://github.com/Cdiallo77/STA9750-2024-FALL/issues/3 - check it out!
https://cdiallo77.github.io/STA9750-2024-FALL/mp03.html