Closed corybarr closed 7 months ago
I've been testing and appears to be working as expected. All I could probably suggest is a warning to the log if a user links a basis curve without a globe anchor (something I've already done by accident).
I've been testing and appears to be working as expected. All I could probably suggest is a warning to the log if a user links a basis curve without a globe anchor (something I've already done by accident).
I can see the use of that. Let's create an issue during standup if we want to. I think our rel
workaround is good as workarounds go, but ultimately we should inherit from a BasisCurves
so we can define the GlobeAnchor
requirement in the schema. So any warnings would be temporary with an issue that keeps us from forgetting to remove them in the future.
Resolves #639 Fixes #632
Based on the plan to add the
CesiumCartographicPolygonPrim
back into the codebase once the issue withBasisCurves
inheritance is fixed, these are the minimal set of code changes to achieve removing the prim. To the end user, the "cartographic polygon" concept and terminology still exists. The term is still used in the UI. The only difference to the end user once the prim is added back should be the type of the prim in the Stage Window.This means that
OmniCartographicPolygon
still exists, even though there is no corresponding USD prim.Test file: noCartographicPolygon.clippingTest.TwoOverlays.usda.zip