Undefined format of IC while some are strangely rejected

[Ch40gRv1-Mu]

There is no definition of the format IC in the UG while some user input are rejected without useful explanation.

[soc-se-bot]

Team's Response

No details provided by team.

The 'Original' Bug

[The team marked this bug as a duplicate of the following bug]

Lacks format introduction of IC

The UG lacks format introduction of IC while not all strings are accepted, which is confusing

---

_{[original: nus-cs2113-AY2122S2/pe-interim#1318] [original labels: severity.Medium type.DocumentationBug]}

Their Response to the 'Original' Bug

[This is the team's response to the above 'original' bug]

Thank you for reporting this.

However, the acceptable format of IC is specified in the UG.

The tester may have unintentionally missed this line. So perhaps this issue should be rejected.

Items for the Tester to Verify

:question: Issue duplicate status

Team chose to mark this issue as a duplicate of another issue (as explained in the Team's response above)

• [ ] I disagree

Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]

---

:question: Issue response

Team chose [response.Rejected]

• [ ] I disagree

Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]

---

:question: Issue type

Team chose [type.DocumentationBug] Originally [type.FeatureFlaw]

• [ ] I disagree

Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]

---