Open hanabi1224 opened 2 weeks ago
For a detailed explanation, see https://github.com/ChainSafe/forest/issues/4432#issuecomment-2180557858
Changes introduced in this pull request:
ReturnTrace::exit_code
Manually tested with the same snapshot that causes CI failures in https://github.com/ChainSafe/forest/actions/runs/9593268587/job/26453560366#step:5:39
forest-tool api compare /data/forest_snapshot_calibnet_2024-06-20_height_1718049.forest.car.zst --forest *** --lotus *** --n-tipsets 10 --filter-file /data/filter-list --miner-address t0111551 --worker-address t3sw466j35hqjbch5x7tcr7ona6idsgzypoturfci2ajqsfrrwhp7ty3ythtd7x646adaidnvxpdr5b2ftcciq
Running `target/quick/forest-tool api compare /home/me/fr/snapshots/calibnet/forest_snapshot_calibnet_2024-06-20_height_1718049.forest.car.zst --filter StateReplay` | RPC Method | Forest | Lotus | |---------------------------|--------|-------| | Filecoin.StateReplay (48) | Valid | Valid |
Running `target/quick/forest-tool api compare /home/me/fr/snapshots/calibnet/forest_snapshot_calibnet_2024-06-20_height_1718049.forest.car.zst --filter StateCall` | RPC Method | Forest | Lotus | |-------------------------|--------|-------| | Filecoin.StateCall (48) | Valid | Valid |
Closes
I recommend we don't merge this so that it's clearly visible that the Forest and Lotus output differs at the currently used versions.
Summary of changes
For a detailed explanation, see https://github.com/ChainSafe/forest/issues/4432#issuecomment-2180557858
Changes introduced in this pull request:
ReturnTrace::exit_code
fieldManually tested with the same snapshot that causes CI failures in https://github.com/ChainSafe/forest/actions/runs/9593268587/job/26453560366#step:5:39
Reference issue to close (if applicable)
Closes
Other information and links
Change checklist