Open kishansagathiya opened 2 months ago
@kishansagathiya from what I understand from the link, the gossip support subsystem
does not create a gossip topology, it only uses the current gossip that already exists to send additional messages, such as Bitfield Distribution
The gossip topology is used for sending GRANDPA commit messages, Block Announcements, and then it should be used to gossip subsystems message among validators that are present in the reserved peer set
group.
The message limitation and the group creating is explained better here https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/issues/3239, but, as I mention, is part of the broader gossip topology that is used by the client in different parts. So the statement:
In addition to that, it creates a gossip overlay topology which limits the amount of messages sent and received to be an order of sqrt of the validators
will need to implemented separately and take in account that it will affect other parts of the code not only subsystems.
cc: @P1sar, @timwu20
the gossip support subsystem does not create a gossip topology
This is what I meant.
You can see in that code a message called NewGossipTopology
being sent. So, it does create gossip topology.
I see, but the gossip topology is not responsibility of the subsystem as it seems to be described in this issue.
I see, but the gossip topology is not responsibility of the subsystem as it seems to be described in this issue.
I have a feeling you might not be happy with the wordings here, but you understand the meaning. If you have any better way to describe it we can change it.
Issue summary
NetworkBridgeRxMessage::NewGossipTopology
message.It would be very important to confirm with polkadot-sdk team, whether gossip support is part of the spec or not and figure out the implications of not using the gossip topology.
Other information and links