Update lodestar ecosystem to ES modules (ESM)

[wemeetagain]

Once lodestar dependencies move to ES modules only, we can't upgrade unless we also move. Since ES modules are the future, we should migrate when possible.

Current progress

• ChainSafe/lodestar: https://github.com/ChainSafe/lodestar/pull/3978
• ChainSafe/lodestar: https://github.com/ChainSafe/lodestar/pull/4114

libp2p

• ChainSafe/js-libp2p-gossipsub: https://github.com/ChainSafe/js-libp2p-gossipsub/pull/236
• ChainSafe/js-libp2p-noise: https://github.com/ChainSafe/js-libp2p-noise/pull/134
• ChainSafe/discv5: https://github.com/ChainSafe/discv5/pull/184

bls

• ChainSafe/bls: https://github.com/ChainSafe/bls/pull/121
• ChainSafe/blst-ts: N/A

ssz

• ChainSafe/ssz: N/A

Related:

• https://github.com/ipfs/js-ipfs/issues/951
• https://github.com/ChainSafe/lodestar/pull/3183
• https://github.com/ChainSafe/lodestar/issues/3182

[dapplion]

Related

• https://github.com/ChainSafe/lodestar/pull/3183
• https://github.com/ChainSafe/lodestar/issues/3182

[philknows]

@wemeetagain Does #3978 conclude the upgrades to ESM? If so, we can close this.

[wemeetagain]

We will migrate our other libraries over to ESM too. ssz monorepo packages, bls packages, discv5, etc. Lower priority tho, no urgency

[wemeetagain]

• https://github.com/ChainSafe/lodestar/pull/4114 is related

[philknows]

We should continue discussing this for https://github.com/ChainSafe/ssz