This PR targets adding the DESC field of PV's on the CF and in the storage DB.
As discussed in #52 adding the DESC field can be very useful for a lot of scenarios.
There is already an implementation on https://github.com/lnls-sol/recsync/pull/1 , however there are some concerns over that implementation that we need to fix/discuss:
Should we always send the DESC field information? Descriptions can be big, and thus we should think if this can create a network traffic problem.
We should add in the server side a flag as default to off for capturing the DESC, so we don't break any running system.
kasemir
commented
2 years ago
This PR targets adding the DESC field of PV's on the CF and in the storage DB.
As discussed in #52 adding the DESC field can be very useful for a lot of scenarios. There is already an implementation on https://github.com/lnls-sol/recsync/pull/1 , however there are some concerns over that implementation that we need to fix/discuss: