Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
The error is now intermittent, and I have gotten it when running interpreted as
well. Maybe it's my machine.
Original comment by alephzil...@gmail.com
on 26 Jul 2008 at 9:42
I consistently get this error when using 'on' with termite compiled. When I
defined
'on' (from comment 1) in the REPL I too had success. I have not yet tested with
interpreted termite.
I am running termite rev. 14 with gambit-c v4_2_8 on Mac OS X 10.5.4 built with
GCC
4.0.1 (Apple Inc. build 5465)
Original comment by ecoph...@gmail.com
on 28 Jul 2008 at 12:56
It seems that changes in Gambit might have caused the compiled version of
Termite to
fail. I'll try to do two things:
1- make the problem go away by figuring the serialization problem
2- improve error handling and reporting in the case where something can't be
serialized
The problem might be pervasive with compiled code, though. I'll investigate.
Original comment by guillaum...@gmail.com
on 7 Aug 2008 at 4:26
Guillame--
If I can help you with any further information or by trying anything, please
let me
know.
Original comment by alephzil...@gmail.com
on 7 Aug 2008 at 7:50
Problem is in base-exception-handler.
If lambda log-crash set to an empty lambda i.e. ... (log-crash (lambda (e)
#t))...,
everything is ok. In this case compiled termit with Gambit-C 4.3.0 works fine
on two
my systems: Linux x86_64 and Linux mipsel32 Au1250
I'am newbie to scheme and Gambit-C (only yesterday started to learn them), and
cannot
determine problem more precisly yet.
Original comment by Vasil....@gmail.com
on 26 Nov 2008 at 4:55
Here is a patch which completely solves the problem.
There were two problems:
1. Error in arguments order in call to ##cmd-b, which led to core dumping on my
systems
2. And issue of partially compiling of lambdas in last versions of gambit, which
makes impossible serialization of them. Solved by specifying some flags to
compiler
in "declare" statement.
See attached patch.
Original comment by Vasil....@gmail.com
on 26 Nov 2008 at 10:41
Attachments:
- the part about ##cmd-b is in the SVN for some time already (it was reported
by me)
- I'm quite sure you don't want the (not safe) declaration, since that only
asks for
new segfault problems
Original comment by christia...@jaeger.mine.nu
on 30 Nov 2008 at 9:28
Fixed in revision 18.
Thanks for report and patch.
Original comment by guillaum...@gmail.com
on 8 May 2009 at 2:21
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
alephzil...@gmail.com
on 24 Jul 2008 at 11:08