Closed tripleee closed 6 years ago
Really a feature request for Metasmoke actually, I guess. Is there a way to move it?
I'd say it should stay here, actually - SmokeDetector has all the parsing code; this is something that would be implemented here, not in metasmoke.
I'd like to give this issue a little bump...
What would happen with the weight of the !!/report command with this? Could this theoretically result in manually reported post being autoflagged?
Yes. However, if the post hits our checks it should have been reported in the first place, which means that it would have been autoflagged anyway.
The only issue is that the 'Manually Reported <Q/A>' reason itself could take a 1-reason post (~90 weight) to 2 reasons, bringing it within low autoflagging territory (~170ish). We can always decide later whether we want the extra human intervention to count as extra weight.
https://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/42954284#42954284
Maybe implement a !!/scan <URL>
command to force a scan on a given post, and nothing should happen if the post is all right.
Edit: Check #1634 I made an attempt do implement one, someone test if it works and see if there's room for improvement.
Edit 2: Finally implemented this FR in #1711 . Should be very good now.
When a post has been manually reported, it's hard manual work to figure out if it was reported because Smoke Detector missed it (which is often a problem which we want to spend time on solving) or just because the reporter was quicker than Smokey (which of course isn't a problem at all). Could the analysis be run on these questions after they've been reported, and included in the Metasmoke record, so that it's easier to see when we have missed something?