Closed tripleee closed 6 years ago
Point 2: 084d6ad296530856cce4c4b7c367c10b5e4d7b06
Point 3 was requested again: http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/34498185#34498185
Would it make more sense to close this and reopen #53?
No, this one works. It's on my radar, just need to find time to do it.
Unless flag weight became a field in posts, I really think this is too expensive to be possible.
The new autoflagging functionality is awesome, but in order to make it even more awesome, we need some way to find the posts which were still not autoflagged, so that we can analyze them and figure out additional heuristics we could put in the system in order to catch similar posts in the future.
I'm vague on what exactly would be useful, and only posting the use case at this point. I can think of some ways which should hopefully be reasonably straightforward, by order of (my limited perception of) apparent complexity.