Example San Hejmo 2024: SaniCamp 1.6 and 1.6 CC (ContentCreator) are at the same location or right next to each other.
Currently, when two spheres are nearer to each other than the defined nearness threshold for the given type of sphere, the system would show only one of the two spheres for confirmation, which is misleading. If it's the wrong one, the user would have to click 'No' and then select manually from all spheres.
Option-1: Go straight to normal sphere selection, skipping auto-detection
Option-2: Optimised usability: sphere selection but with reduced choice - but that's problematic if the user actually wants to choose totally different sphere.
Option-3: Probably best usability: modified confirmation dialogue: Are you at one of these two spheres? With possibility to select OR to click 'no' for normal full selection.
This is only relevant, if we get actual usage of live-location sharing etc.
Example San Hejmo 2024: SaniCamp 1.6 and 1.6 CC (ContentCreator) are at the same location or right next to each other.
Currently, when two spheres are nearer to each other than the defined nearness threshold for the given type of sphere, the system would show only one of the two spheres for confirmation, which is misleading. If it's the wrong one, the user would have to click 'No' and then select manually from all spheres.
Option-1: Go straight to normal sphere selection, skipping auto-detection Option-2: Optimised usability: sphere selection but with reduced choice - but that's problematic if the user actually wants to choose totally different sphere. Option-3: Probably best usability: modified confirmation dialogue: Are you at one of these two spheres? With possibility to select OR to click 'no' for normal full selection.
This is only relevant, if we get actual usage of live-location sharing etc.