Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Original comment by albe...@google.com
on 16 Feb 2012 at 9:16
Is it because of --profile=1? this will force the use of simple loopfilter and
bilinear filter in MC. Default profile=0 is better suited for best quality
encoding.
Original comment by attilan...@google.com
on 20 Feb 2012 at 7:44
The quality is similar with --profile 0. Seek to 1:46 in this video
profile 0:
http://fbarchard0-w.ad.corp.google.com/testmatrix/mediaFiles/red_profile0/red2.w
ebm
profile 1:
http://fbarchard0-w.ad.corp.google.com/testmatrix/mediaFiles/red/red2.webm
settings for profile 0
vpxenc --passes=2 --profile=0 --fps=30000/1001 --static-thresh=0 --drop-frame=0
--best --auto-alt-ref=1 --minsection-pct=0 --maxsection-pct=1200
--lag-in-frames=16 --kf-min-dist=0 --kf-max-dist=250 --min-q=0 --max-q=63 -t 4
-w 1920 -h 1080 --target-bitrate=3000 red.1920x1080_30Hz_P420.yuv -o
red_tmp_0.webm
You should have source to this video and be able to reproduce the issue.
So far I've tried Cayuga vs Duclair, good vs best and profile 0 vs 1.
psnr/ssim is low for the affected frames.
Original comment by fbarch...@google.com
on 21 Feb 2012 at 6:34
Using --max-q=42 avoids the issue on this video, but causes high bitrates on
others.
--minsection-pct=20 reduces the issue, with less side effect. See attached
Original comment by fbarch...@google.com
on 5 Mar 2012 at 5:59
Attachments:
Original comment by albe...@google.com
on 8 Mar 2012 at 12:04
Original comment by albe...@google.com
on 8 Mar 2012 at 12:26
Setting --minsection-pct=20 works around the issue with existing/old vpxenc.
A prerelease candidate has a bit rate logic change that assigns more bits to
'easy' sections and also works. Both are satisfactory for my use case.
Original comment by fbarch...@google.com
on 24 Mar 2012 at 6:32
[deleted comment]
This bug can be closed. The bitrate logic was improved and quality is okay now.
Original comment by fbarch...@google.com
on 4 Jun 2013 at 6:20
Original comment by louquil...@google.com
on 15 Aug 2013 at 10:11
FYI This issue is also fixed for vp9.
Original comment by fbarch...@google.com
on 19 Aug 2013 at 5:58
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
fbarch...@google.com
on 9 Feb 2012 at 3:26Attachments: