search

Chen-tao / webm

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/webm
0 stars 0 forks source link

test_speed fail #438

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Observed for
------------
Windows 32/64

Tester Command Line
-------------------
VP8_Tester_API_32Bit.exe  test_speed src16.ivf 0 128 10 webm y4m

Summary Results:
----------------
      CpuUsed - 2 Encode Tick: 2152814 < CpuUsed - 1 Encode Tick: 2854818
      CpuUsed - 2 PSNR: 35.10 within 10% of CpuUsed - 1 PSNR: 35.42
      CpuUsed - 3 Encode Tick: 1544410 < CpuUsed - 2 Encode Tick: 2152814
      CpuUsed - 3 PSNR: 34.60 within 10% of CpuUsed - 2 PSNR: 35.10
      CpuUsed - 4 Encode Tick: 873605 < CpuUsed - 3 Encode Tick: 1544410
      CpuUsed - 4 PSNR: 34.32 within 10% of CpuUsed - 3 PSNR: 34.60
      CpuUsed - 5 Encode Tick: 468003 < CpuUsed - 4 Encode Tick: 873605
      CpuUsed - 5 PSNR: 34.19 within 10% of CpuUsed - 4 PSNR: 34.32
Fail: CpuUsed - 6 Encode Tick: 514803 > CpuUsed - 5 Encode Tick: 468003
      CpuUsed - 6 PSNR: 33.96 within 10% of CpuUsed - 5 PSNR: 34.19
      CpuUsed - 7 Encode Tick: 405603 < CpuUsed - 6 Encode Tick: 514803
      CpuUsed - 7 PSNR: 34.01 within 10% of CpuUsed - 6 PSNR: 33.96
Fail: CpuUsed - 8 Encode Tick: 436802 > CpuUsed - 7 Encode Tick: 405603
      CpuUsed - 8 PSNR: 33.98 within 10% of CpuUsed - 7 PSNR: 34.01
      CpuUsed - 9 Encode Tick: 390003 < CpuUsed - 8 Encode Tick: 436802
      CpuUsed - 9 PSNR: 33.89 within 10% of CpuUsed - 8 PSNR: 33.98
      CpuUsed -10 Encode Tick: 296401 < CpuUsed - 9 Encode Tick: 390003
      CpuUsed -10 PSNR: 33.76 within 10% of CpuUsed - 9 PSNR: 33.89
      CpuUsed -11 Encode Tick: 249603 < CpuUsed -10 Encode Tick: 296401
      CpuUsed -11 PSNR: 33.55 within 10% of CpuUsed -10 PSNR: 33.76
Fail: CpuUsed -12 Encode Tick: 265202 > CpuUsed -11 Encode Tick: 249603
      CpuUsed -12 PSNR: 33.19 within 10% of CpuUsed -11 PSNR: 33.55
      CpuUsed -13 Encode Tick: 218402 < CpuUsed -12 Encode Tick: 265202
      CpuUsed -13 PSNR: 33.11 within 10% of CpuUsed -12 PSNR: 33.19
Fail: CpuUsed -14 Encode Tick: 280802 > CpuUsed -13 Encode Tick: 218402
      CpuUsed -14 PSNR: 32.74 within 10% of CpuUsed -13 PSNR: 33.11
      CpuUsed -15 Encode Tick: 187201 < CpuUsed -14 Encode Tick: 280802
      CpuUsed -15 PSNR: 31.94 within 10% of CpuUsed -14 PSNR: 32.74
Fail: CpuUsed -16 Encode Tick: 218401 > CpuUsed -15 Encode Tick: 187201
      CpuUsed -16 PSNR: 31.91 within 10% of CpuUsed -15 PSNR: 31.94

Results:

 * Not enough encode ticks decrease as CpuUsed increases - Failed
 * All PSNRs are within 10% - Passed
 * Not all Encode speeds are within 10% - Failed

Failed

Original issue reported on code.google.com by jamesbe...@google.com on 10 May 2012 at 3:25

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
5 did not get faster but others should. (Is this a flaky test?) 

Scott can you approve that if we lower the complexity the passes should be 
faster. 

We might need a good clip for this and more machines for this.

Original comment by albe...@google.com on 10 May 2012 at 6:15

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
> if we lower the complexity the passes should be faster.

Not necessarily.  Some complexities will enable/disable the loopfilter, which 
can cause this effect.  I have seen this with good quality mode.  We can 
investigate this further.

Original comment by slavarn...@google.com on 10 May 2012 at 6:34

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by jimbankoski@google.com on 24 May 2012 at 6:17

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by jimbankoski@google.com on 24 May 2012 at 6:17

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by fgalli...@google.com on 16 Jan 2015 at 6:46