ChenDelong1999 / RemoteCLIP

🛰️ Official repository of paper "RemoteCLIP: A Vision Language Foundation Model for Remote Sensing" (IEEE TGRS)
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.11029
Apache License 2.0
310 stars 22 forks source link

Can you give the accurate number of few-shot accuracy linear prob? #3

Closed chagmgang closed 1 year ago

ChenDelong1999 commented 1 year ago

Hi, the followings are the few-shot evaluation result of RemoteCLIP in the Fig. 8 of our paper:

image


ResNet-50

n-shot RSI-CB128 RSI-CB256 WHU-earth EuroSAT MLRSNet PatternNet RESISC45 AID RS2800 OPTIMAL-31 RSC11 WHU-RS19
1-shot 35.59 42.52 44.25 43.20 31.75 46.10 39.33 36.95 41.93 42.80 48.13 45.15
4-shot 60.04 65.44 62.96 55.53 46.90 66.99 52.11 63.13 56.21 62.63 61.67 73.59
8-shot 69.55 75.89 75.38 61.75 55.02 77.07 61.75 70.50 63.29 73.01 72.51 85.44
16-shot 77.58 83.72 77.67 70.36 59.74 82.93 69.51 75.12 73.86 75.38 76.57 89.32
32-shot 82.02 87.04 85.08 77.44 64.99 88.32 75.71 82.46 77.71 81.61 83.82 93.79

ViT-B-32

n-shot RSI-CB128 RSI-CB256 WHU-earth EuroSAT MLRSNet PatternNet RESISC45 AID RS2800 OPTIMAL-31 RSC11 WHU-RS19
1-shot 34.31 44.28 41.25 44.89 34.14 45.98 42.10 37.04 39.29 41.13 44.14 40.78
4-shot 64.49 70.33 60.67 55.99 54.52 70.98 60.91 65.59 55.96 69.30 61.99 68.16
8-shot 76.13 83.73 75.71 65.76 64.24 82.53 70.92 75.72 63.75 77.85 72.43 80.68
16-shot 82.63 89.12 77.50 75.73 67.45 88.13 75.83 81.05 71.61 82.20 77.13 89.51
32-shot 88.11 91.83 87.08 83.30 71.58 91.87 81.77 86.67 81.61 89.14 85.50 93.40
chagmgang commented 1 year ago

So, in the case of 32-shot, only 32 shots per class were used for learning and the rest were used for testing?

ChenDelong1999 commented 1 year ago

Actually no, we randomly sample different amount (1-shot to 32-shot) of few-shot examples from the 80% training split, and keep the testing set the same - all settings use the remaining 20% testing split.

chagmgang commented 1 year ago

Thank you!