search

Chia-Network / chia-blockchain

Chia blockchain python implementation (full node, farmer, harvester, timelord, and wallet)
Apache License 2.0
10.82k stars 2.03k forks source link

[INFO] plots check - proofs overflow #4840

Closed nerotiger closed 3 years ago

nerotiger commented 3 years ago

Describe the bug A clear and concise description of what the bug is. (If what you are experiencing is NOT a bug but instead a support issue, please open a Discussion instead!)

(venv) [x@y chia-blockchain]$ chia plots check

2021-05-14T01:35:54.848  chia.plotting.check_plots        : INFO     Loading plots in config.yaml using plot_tools loading code
2021-05-14T01:35:58.683  chia.plotting.plot_tools         : INFO     Found plot /public/home/xxxxb2f3f.plot of size 32
2021-05-14T01:35:58.683  chia.plotting.plot_tools         : INFO     Found plot /public/home/xxxx8d85.plot of size 32
2021-05-14T01:35:58.684  chia.plotting.plot_tools         : INFO     Loaded a total of 2 plots of size 0.19792098594280105 TiB, in 0.21859955787658691 seconds   
2021-05-14T01:35:58.684  chia.plotting.check_plots        : INFO     Starting to test each plot with 30 challenges each
2021-05-14T01:35:58.684  chia.plotting.check_plots        : INFO     Testing plot /public/home/xxxx8d85.plot k=32
2021-05-14T01:35:58.684  chia.plotting.check_plots        : INFO        Pool public key: a
2021-05-14T01:35:58.718  chia.plotting.check_plots        : INFO        Farmer public key: b
2021-05-14T01:35:58.719  chia.plotting.check_plots        : INFO        Local sk: <PrivateKey c>
2021-05-14T01:37:19.731  chia.plotting.check_plots        : INFO        **Proofs 39 / 30, 1.3**

To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior:

run command "chia plots check" with/without -n 30 or 50 Proofs 56 / 50, 1.12 Proofs 39 / 30, 1.3

however, for the other plot, I have had a percentage under 100%

Expected behavior A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen. The check should return a proof value within 100%.

Screenshots If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem. image

Desktop (please complete the following information):

tokenhoki commented 3 years ago

i got it too bug

8travis commented 3 years ago

it's not a bug. Some plots have greater per-byte effectiveness

nerotiger commented 3 years ago

What it implies ( per-byte effectiveness)? Does it mean such plots have more chances to win against the others?

On Thu, 13 May 2021 at 23:43, 8travis @.***> wrote:

it's not a bug. Some plots have greater per-byte effectiveness

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Chia-Network/chia-blockchain/issues/4840#issuecomment-840852190, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB6N3UO3UNUKIASWNZFCEXLTNRBWVANCNFSM443BH34A .

-- This e-mail, any attachments and the information contained therein ("this message") are confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee(s). If you have received this message in error please send it back to the sender and delete it. Unauthorized publication, use, dissemination or disclosure of this message, either in whole or in part is strictly prohibited.

Ce message electronique et tous les fichiers joints ainsi que les informations contenues dans ce message ( ci apres "le message" ), sont confidentiels et destines exclusivement a l'usage de la personne a laquelle ils sont adresses. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, merci de le renvoyer a son emetteur et de le detruire. Toutes diffusion, publication, totale ou partielle ou divulgation sous quelque forme que se soit non expressement autorisees de ce message, sont interdites.

inan0812 commented 3 years ago

This is not a bug. Your plots either pass or fail. The numbers don't mean anything.

nerotiger commented 3 years ago

This is not a bug. Your plots either pass or fail. The numbers don't mean anything. Then why should they (the official) provide such a figure? What this number is indicating?

inan0812 commented 3 years ago

This is not a bug. Your plots either pass or fail. The numbers don't mean anything. Then why should they (the official) provide such a figure? What this number is indicating?

The number indicates whether you passed or failed any.

nerotiger commented 3 years ago

Any percentage either greater than or less than 1, as long as not 0, meant passed?

On Sat, 15 May 2021 at 00:46, inan0812 @.***> wrote:

This is not a bug. Your plots either pass or fail. The numbers don't mean anything. Then why should they (the official) provide such a figure? What this number is indicating?

The number indicates whether you passed or failed any.

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Chia-Network/chia-blockchain/issues/4840#issuecomment-841537790, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB6N3UPY74MRDQVIELFXVSLTNWR35ANCNFSM443BH34A .

-- This e-mail, any attachments and the information contained therein ("this message") are confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee(s). If you have received this message in error please send it back to the sender and delete it. Unauthorized publication, use, dissemination or disclosure of this message, either in whole or in part is strictly prohibited.

Ce message electronique et tous les fichiers joints ainsi que les informations contenues dans ce message ( ci apres "le message" ), sont confidentiels et destines exclusivement a l'usage de la personne a laquelle ils sont adresses. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, merci de le renvoyer a son emetteur et de le detruire. Toutes diffusion, publication, totale ou partielle ou divulgation sous quelque forme que se soit non expressement autorisees de ce message, sont interdites.

github-actions[bot] commented 3 years ago

This issue has been flagged as stale as there has been no activity on it in 14 days. If this issue is still affecting you and in need of review, please update it to keep it open.

github-actions[bot] commented 3 years ago

This issue was automatically closed because it has been flagged as stale and subsequently passed 7 days with no further activity.