ChiaraPalladino
commented
4 months ago @aspainhour1 I am wondering if it's the case to integrate the annotation guidelines with some indication on how to address violent language. I kind of get why certain sentences are positive, even though they are extremely violent and vengeful (yikes) but this is something worth documenting more formally. Let me know your thougths.
Actually, this could be interesting for @bailsy6 as well. There is plenty of menacing language in Wasps. We need to find a way to document the context of violence and to annotate it consistently. Keep this in mind for our next meeting, it's better to discuss it.
Week two consisted of identifying the verses associated with each sentence number and beginning to analyze the sentences. I began with line 337, these are not final classifications and will be revised as needed. Additionally, I worked on marking places on the spreadsheet where sentences were excluded.