Closed geneorama closed 3 years ago
@nicklucius Starting this as a separate issue because it's truly unique.
I'm assuming that you want to call this Version: 1.7.11-2
. Let me know if you'd prefer 1.7.12-0
, 1.7.12-1
or something else.
@geneorama thanks, yep it will be 1.7.11-2.
FYI, the URL for coveralls is not an HTTP/HTTPS issue.
It looks like this is the original and replacement link pattern: https://coveralls.io/r/Chicago/RSocrata?branch=dev https://coveralls.io/github/Chicago/RSocrata?branch=dev
Also, some HTTP links were not in the check, but thought this would be a good time to update them as well. I did the unnecessary HTTP changes in a separate commit so that they could be rolled back if there was a problem.
Although I hesitate to make unnecessary changes, I felt that only updating the minimum necessary would fall more in the category of malicious compliance rather than scope creep.
@nicklucius
When I built I saw this message:
==> devtools::check(args = c('--as-cran'))
-- Building ------ RSocrata --
Setting env vars:
------------------------------
i Installed roxygen2 version (7.1.1) doesn't match required version (6.1.1)
x check() will not re-document this package
------------------------------
* CFLAGS : -Wall -pedantic -fdiagnostics-color=always
* CXXFLAGS : -Wall -pedantic -fdiagnostics-color=always
* CXX11FLAGS: -Wall -pedantic -fdiagnostics-color=always
------------------------------
The DESCRIPTION
has this: "roxygen2 (>= 4.1.0)".
@nicklucius do you know why it's not rebuilding the help? I'm concerned that the old HTTP links will remain in the documentation.
This passed CRAN checks and is now live on CRAN.
CRAN is requesting that we fix the links that are permanently moved, mostly to HTTPS
The relevant portion of the check results:
https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/RSocrata_1.7.11-1_20210911_035815/Debian/00check.log https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/RSocrata_1.7.11-1_20210911_035815/Windows/00check.log