Grading Ava

Feature	Evaluation	Score	Grader
Each individual has GitHub Page, Wiki, or deployed Web Page that Highlights talking points and learnings from each FRQ	Wiki is well detailed and gives thoughts, insights, and learnings on each FRQ, with code snippets too.	3/3	Sam
Each Individual has their own set of FRQs running under one page or menu	All FRQs were neatly organized in one Repl and easy to find. Problems were that I had to input the number twice for it to run and I had to rerun the program after each FRQ	2.6/3	Sam
Each Individual has a GitHub of source for every FRQ that is integrated with Deployed Java/Spring or Replit	FRQs are embedded and easy to find on site through Repl	2/2	Sam
At least 2 FRQs with input and output	Lots of FRQs have inputs, way more than minimum of 2	1/1	Sam

Sam's FRQ Comparison and Reflection

General Reflection : I struggled with some FRQs and glided through others. I think that I definitely learned a lot from these and got great practice from the ones that I was already familiar with. For some that I needed a little bit of help on, I used it as a learning opportunity and grew from it.
Comparison Reflection: Mine and Ava's FRQs had their strengths and weaknesses, I believe that they were both great. I think that while mine were a little bit more functional, they were a little bit sloppier and harder to follow. Ava's FRQs were much easier to follow and laid out very cleanly, although they were slightly less functional in the way that you had to re-run the program for each individual FRQ.

Sam FRQs	Ava FRQs	Comparison
Frq #2	Frq #2	Ava has inputs for this FRQ, Sam does not. Both still give the right output.
Frq #6	Frq #6	Both have inputs for this FRQ but for different purposes.
Frq #10	Frq #10	Both function nearly the exact same but are created very differently.